Reviews from

in the past


Played remaster version, pistols only
Pretty solid game, good platforming, good puzzles that are never too tough but satisfying, combat is OK, except in the last third which introduces really obnoxious enemies

Some secrets were a little random or cheap, sort of enforcing a guide if you want them all

i really love this kind of level design. it's so easy to accidentally speedrun some of the levels lol. i played this through the new hd remaster. this game is fantastic but if i had to rely on save crystals it'd be far more frustrating. if you can handle tank controls, i really recommend the remaster or at the very least the og pc version. this game is so cool.

This is one of my top 3 favourite Tomb Raider games, I even prefer this original version over the Anniversary one. It is easy to play once you get used to it, if you finish it once you can finish it faster and faster the more you play it. I even once finished the game in a single day.

Also, this game is quite ahead of its time, keep that in mind.

Game still mostly holds up, the controls work for the level design and the general slow and deliberate type of platforming the game has you do. But kind of falls apart when you have to fight (especially the stronger enemies near the end)

Level design is mostly solid and I was able to find my way around fine most of the time, the final level however got pretty frustrating with all the enemies it throws at you often in very enclosed spaces.

Just using a D-Pad makes your nail feels crazy wtf


I actually find this pretty compelling, almost relaxing. Played 2.5 stages.

The art and ambience in particular is stunning, I love the use of light and vegetation. Spatially it's like this minimalist take on early FPS shooters... the secrets, the weird score popup at the end of levels. The lack of HUD elements in gameplay and minimal save points, no guidance is really nice.

That being said! The controls are really really bad - and I don't mean the precision and slow pacing, which I think are unique and valuable, but like there's just so much bumping into walls and doing these huge moves I don't expect her to do. It's just a level too unpleasant for the vibe they're going for.

The price for dying or slipping is pretty severe (being set back minutes of tedious traversal).

But if you ignore that what you have is a really interesting 3D platformer that's all about reading the environment. It really feels 'adventure-y', although I can't help but wish for something that was a bit more compelling conceptually other than raiding ancient ruins one after another.

ACABOU!
Só fez sucesso por conta da personagem gasosa, que jogo chato, monótono e com mecânicas muito ruins. Oque se salva é o level designe, mas ainda sim é ruim porque muitas vezes você não faz ideia de onde ir.
Uma das piores experiências que já tive com um jogo, que jogo mid!

06/10.

92

Tomb Raider in a few ways feel like the antithesis of Mario. While Mario is focused on fast and slick movement throughout zany and expansive worlds, Tomb Raider is more slow and methodical with its platforming and is more focused on grounded and atmospheric levels. They are wildly different in their goals, but that doesn't stop the both of them from being fun as hell.

Tomb Raider's style is not for everyone, but I never once thought the game was being too unfair. The most seemingly unfair mechanic that being the combat can be clunky, but as long as you're smart with your jumps and conserve the right ammo most combat encounters won't be that much of a problem. Everything else in this game is perfect, especially the save point placements. The person who placed them deserves a raise and a kiss on the cheek.

The first cutscene with the wolfs still makes me sh*t my pants.

It is mindboggling how influential this game and its PS1-era sequels weren't. They sold countless copies and embedded Lara as a character into the wider pop culture, yet the number of notable games that take direct design inspiration from how they play can likely be counted on one hand. If it has any true lineage to be found it isn't in the likes of Uncharted or the post-Sands of Time Prince of Persia games but rather the work of indies like Bennet Foddy or Anders Jensen's Peaks of Yore. Works that attempt to reinject the feeling of tension into a player's movement abilities. Keeping the level of friction high at all times. However even those games evoke the same sensations via very different control schemes. I am obsessive about discovering new games. I regularly scroll through the ocean of noise that is the Steam new releases queue, hoping to find something neat in the endless procession of porn games and Vampire Survivors clones. I keep track of a million in-development indie projects. I would confidently say I am about as up on what's being made as a single person can get. Yet I never see anything even close to a 'Tomb Raider Clone'. Which is not to say some don't exist somewhere, deep in someone's itch.io page. But the fact that one of the biggest runs of success a series has ever had hasn't spawned a visible scene^ is remarkable in an age where every possible trend from gaming's history, no matter how archaic, is being explored by both indies and megacorps alike.

TR's controls were, are, and forever will be, exceptional. Yes, obviously they are somewhat awkward. But they are also also extremely precise with reliable rules about what works in what situation, how many steps you can take before a jump, which button presses have priorities over others, the exact timing for that last-second leap. Each jump feels chunky, weighty. Even just pulling yourself up onto a ledge has serious tactility to it. It all makes cutting corners with your decisions a no-no, instead nudging you to work through the proressions of your movement thoughtfully - often with pre-planning - or face the neck-breaking consequences. From the beginning of the game till the end there is heart-in-mouth excitement in even the simplest of challenges. This is the ideal. This is how it should be. Make no mistake: the controls can be mastered. It's just that 'mastery' here means a confidence in your actions, becoming more fluid in your transitions between movement states. Not an ascension to platforming godhood. I am both terrible at games and easily annoyed yet no fibre in my being would ever consider these controls 'bad'. They achieve exactly what they aim for and, more importantly, what I desire from them.

The problem, then, is that Core Design... Well they didn't understand the core of what they had designed. There are issues in level design and pacing, yes. Some of the puzzles are a nonsense. But all of that is small potatoes. The main downer is that this game and all of its direct successors are plagued by combat that is fundamentally at odds with the rest of its makeup. Lara moves deliberately. Her enemies move quickly, have wonky hit/hurtboxes and are often sprung on the player out of nowhere. Sometimes they have guns which operate on the same laser-accurate rules as Lara's. They are seemingly made for a different game entirely.

It's not that combat is difficult. Health and ammo is plentiful, dying only ever really happens when taken completely offguard. It's that it's stunningly annoying and fuck me there is a lot of it. Running around in circles holding the shoot button, sometimes doing a flip, the height of strategy being to position yourself directly behind your opponent such that they literally just can't do anything because they have to turn towards you before they inevitably do and grind another chunk off your healthbar. Your healthbar outlasts theirs, they die. You feel nothing other than a pissed off sense of 'thank god that's over'. Rinse, repeat for 15 hours. It only becomes tolerable when avoiding it entirely by just standing on a platform where the enemy cant reach Lara.

It's this aspect that makes the lack of extrapolation on the format from other devs even more unfortunate. I don't blame Core Design for how they formulated things. There's still plenty else it did well (the atmosphere, so thick at all times!). They were doing something new out there on their own when the industry was in a more nascent stage. We've a wealth of knowledge now about this type of game is best handled - hell just take out the combat entirely lads, it isn't absolutely necessary - and few out there keen on putting it to use. Here's to hoping the remasters spark a little something.

^I should note that the early TR games have a wonderfully vibrant modding and level-creation community. Amazing work is being done by a super dedicated group. Eg: https://www.pcgamer.com/meet-the-community-creating-classic-tomb-raider-adventures-in-2021/. Probably the most straightforward partial answer to the question 'where are all the new takes on old Tomb Raider' is 'the people who would make them are making them in Tomb Raider'

Классика, даже сейчас играется очень кайфово, особенно после сложной четвертой части. По сравнению с ней, первая часть это чилловая прогулка.

На удивление, затупов прям конкретных не было и я смог пройти игру и без гайда. Много моментов мне конечно были знакомы по Anniversary. Вообще, поиграв в оригинал, понял, насколько много изменили в Anniversary. Комнаты богов в Греции сильно расширили, сделали боссов поинтереснее, да и в целом добавили много чего. Правда вместе с этим некоторые моменты в Anniversary сделали душнее.

Всё равно считаю ремейк неплохим, но удовольствия получил больше от оригинала. В нём нету прям душных, сильно сложных моментов, играешь и погружаешься полностью в этот увлекатльный луп: исследуешь локацию, убиваешь монстров, подбираешь предметы, активируешь рычаги, продвигаешься дальше. Из-за этого играется всё очень приятно, и я даже думаю готов поставить игре 5 звёзд.

(First time playthrough as part of Tomb Raider I-III Remastered)

The first Tomb Raider is a solid 3D platformer that, while it definitely shows its age in some areas, excels in others. Above all else, it is a unique game that could unfortunately not be made today -- not for any stupid culture war reasons, but because its game design, as compelling as it may be, is decidedly at odds with that of modern action/adventure games. The fact that these games even got a (great) remaster at all is a surprise, but certainly a welcome one.

Like many early 3D games, Tomb Raider is light on story, sending Lara on the hunt for an artifact in Peru after a short introductory cutscene. There's probably about five minutes of dialogue across the entire game, if that -- and most of that occurs in the final level. Still, cheesy as the writing may be, Lara and Natla's personalities come through well, and I imagine Lara is given a bit more development in the later classic games.

With the story almost entirely in the backseat, the clear focus of Tomb Raider is in the gameplay. I had heard the horror stories of the game's tank controls, but as a big fan of the original Resident Evil, I found them quite comfortable, and quickly gave up trying to use the new "modern" control scheme included in the remaster. Unlike the newer Tomb Raider or Uncharted games, platforming is the main source of difficulty. You don't just tap a button to automatically grab the next platform, you have to manually line the jumps up with the D-Pad and the jump button, accounting for distance if necessary. There's little handholding, and jumping too far or too short will usually mean Lara's untimely demise. This might sound miserable on paper, but in practice, it just works; as you practice the platforming and controls, you gain enough confidence to bounce through levels without taking time to line your jumps up. It's a simple system that rewards mastery, and the precision of the tank controls means that any platforming-related death is firmly the fault of the player.

While the platforming is great, the rest of the gameplay has not aged so gracefully. There is plenty of combat, especially in the Egypt and Atlantis levels, and it is clunky at best, terrible at worst. There is (thankfully?) no manual aiming: Lara will lock on to targets in front of her and you can blast them apart with ease. The annoyances come in when there are multiple enemies or you have to fight in a tight space; the camera is a mess in combat, and the fact that you have to flip through the air to reliably avoid damage only exacerbates the issues. Some of the later enemies will also jump around you faster than the camera can keep up, leading to some headache inducing fights. I'm not sure how they could have done the combat differently here, but even when you're only dealing with one enemy at a time, it's more tedious than challenging.

Another issue I have with the game is the lack of variety. Although there are 15 levels, this is spread across four different zones, with each level largely having the same aesthetic and challenges as the other levels in the same zone. This is less of an issue in Peru and Atlantis, but Greece and Egypt feel repetitive and samey (Greece, in particular, has no reason to be five levels long). I would have liked to see more locations with fewer levels each for the sake of shaking up some of the monotony. Similarly, although I tend to like the obtuse '90s level design and exploration, it doesn't feel very rewarding once you realize that you're only going to be finding medkits and ammo that, in all likelihood, you won't need. Making ammo and health more rare, or having treasures to loot, may have worked better for me here.

Overall, I enjoyed playing through the first Tomb Raider and look forward to starting the sequels soon. Although there are a number of shortcomings due to its age and being the first entry in the series, I had a good time, and the platforming is fun and unlike anything else on the market today.

Finally played this for the first time on PC with Automated Fix. Not gona lie, I really dig it. The atmosphere kills and I adore the soundtrack. I can't even say I agree this has aged horribly, it's damn well-designed. Basically a cinematic platformer like Prince of Persia or Another World but flipped into the third dimension. And just as unforgiving as its 2D sibllings aswell. I will finish this game eventually, but Sanctuary of the Scion has me kinda stuck right now, so might as well take a break, maybe try some of the other games.

Link to my full review of Tomb Raider: https://www.backloggd.com/u/NovaNiles/review/1411026/

Played the 2024 remastered version

I think I enjoyed this game more as a spectacle. These remastered versions did not get the attention they deserved as they did something that not many remasters do: kept as true to the source material as possible. They did this to the point that there is literally a button on the controller that instantly switches between the old and new graphics, something very fun to do every so often.

In terms of the game itself, it has it's strengths and weaknesses. What Tomb Raider set out to do in 1996 was phenomenal, an Indiana jones style 3D video game, and they achieved that. However the combat is terrible, and unfortunately common, some of the puzzles just require to look around for ages, and the camera can be really, really bad at times.

However what's left is a cinematic puzzle platformer that takes you through some cool environments with some satisfying moments. The lack of music in tomb raider could be looked at as a negative, but actually I think using the music in the moments it does gives you a sense of achievement, which is powerful in itself.

I definitely think retro game enthusiasts should give this a try if they haven't touched the original Lara Croft games due to age, especially since the saving system has been buffed to the max, allowing to to save + load wherever, whenever

Tomb Raider stars Lara Croft as she is hired to recover an artefact from Peru, which leads her on a path to discovering a lost city after being double crossed. There is barely any story for the Most part, with most cutscenes only happening after a block of levels. The end takes quite a turn as the true antagonist is revealed, it’s pretty nutty, but as deep as a rain puddle.

As a game, TR sets the foundation that would no doubt be a Huge inspiration to the whole industry, leading to titles like Uncharted (and by extension a lot of the AAA industry). The difference is that TR is far less automated for better, and for worse.

It’s a platformer with a focus on puzzle solving and Exploration, Lara can make long jumps, cling onto ledges and even perform a few acrobatics to deal with tricky obstacles. It has tank controls though, and while I was able to adjust to them, sometimes the lack of precision is a nightmare. It’s very easy to just walk straight off a ledge due to an awkward camera angle suddenly changing which messed with your controls. Lara also can’t seem to decide whether to cling onto ledges when going down, as often my roll over the edge would result in her catapulting herself forward to an instant death.

Gunplay Isn’t very good, despite the auto lock on it’s hard to really avoid enemies due to how stiff you are. There’s a decent selection of weapons to choose from, but you have to find them first.

The levels start off incredibly, with densely packed sections that were an honest joy to explore. The hidden areas were a great incentive to check every nook and cranny of each stage. But the last 3rd of the game really started to Drag, levels get way too long, confusing and frustrating with the amount of beginners traps that kill you instantly. I’m glad you can save anywhere.

It drops off pretty hard towards the end, but overall pretty fun - 6.5/10

I jumped into Tomb Raider because I know it was such a major event when it came out, and is in many ways a major part of gaming history, but after playing over 10 hours of the game, I have to apply the Starfield principle and abandon this. It is a real shame, because part of me does want to see it through to the end, but I just have way too many games which I could be playing and having a better time with than this. I have to mention right away as well that I played on the PC port of the game, which seems to be an inferior version fo the game from what I have read, but nevertheless I can only review what I played. I will mention that in an era of digital ownership and remasters replacing originals, I do think it is commendable that the original games are still available.

I don't believe the game isn't bad, but, in my opinion, it definitely isn't good either. For the most part, I just found it to be incredibly boring. The first cutscene, featuring Lara backflipping off of a cliff to open fire on a pack of wolves with her dual pistols, got me excited, promising a corny 90s action hero story which I was 100% down for. But this pretty much disappears right away; the mind-numbing levels made me pretty apathetic to whatever Lara's goal was, and to be honest, that was never entirely clear to me, as the story is pretty bare-bones. To be honest though, I was not going into this game expecting a story at all, so that is not something I hold against the game.

For a puzzle game, I don't think there was anything which actually constituted a puzzle that I solved. Most of the levels consist of you traversing rooms which usually branch off of a central room, until you pull a lever, which unlocks more rooms, or pick up a key to unlock a door, which unlocks even more rooms.

That does undersell the game somewhat, because to be fair, the level design is excellent. Each one feels unique, and it is easy to know where you are in relation to any part of a level at any given time. The platforming setups are intuitive and Lara has a vaste swathe of different moves she can use to traverse the world. The game cleverly gives you the tools to move around the level however you want, in levels that are designed to guide you in a certain direction.

There is also an element of exploration afforded to the player, but the major flaw in this is that there is actually no reason to do it. I really think it is exceptionally lame that finding secret or hidden rooms (marked by a chime the game plays when you find one) means you get an extra couple of shots in your shotgun, or an extra small health pack. Ammunition was rarely a problem given your pistols, the default weapon, have infinite ammo, so "rewarding" the player for putting extra effort into exploration with basic resources seems like a major oversight. For some people, it will be worth it just to have the 100% completion on the level, but to me this just made the secrets irrelevant.

The most damning mark against the game for me was actually not, as so often seems to be the case, the controls. I think the tank controls actually make a lot of sense for this kind of platformer, letting you line up your jumps carefully and giving the developers the ability to map Lara's moves in a way that makes sense. I also think the grid system makes a lot of sense. Having that basic unit of measurement made it easy to tell if you could make a jump, climb a wall, or (in theory) how far Lara will move. However, the way Lara herself controls is where the game lets itself down. I guess they call them tank controls for a reason, because Lara controls like you are driving a 100 tonne piece of war machinery. Lara often walks too far, doesn't walk far enough, jumps too early, doesn't jump at all, jumps in the wrong direction, doesn't grab a ledge but grabs it the next time when it seems like you did the exact same thing, won't pull a lever, won't move a block, tries to climb onto a block when you're trying to push it, it is actually painful. The way Lara turns around, rotating like a dish in the microwave, is so slow it feels like it takes 15 minutes to turn 90 degrees. At least she has a roll she can use as a quick turn, but you often can't use this when you're on a smalll pillar you dont want to risk her falling off to her death, or when you don't want to turn all the way around.

What I would say is that you do get used to the controls themselves, and I wouldn't give up right at the start just because of them. Maybe you won't be as bothered by the jankiness as I was, which would negate a large negative from the game when you experience it.

The way Lara controls also makes combat way more difficult than it had to be. Getting backed into a corner is often a death sentence, because the stun lock will prevent you from jumping over the enemy, but by the time you turn Lara around to run in a different direction, you're already dead. If this doesn't happen, combat can actually be pretty fun. When Lara decides to respond to your inputs, you can dodge and weave around enemies in a satisfying way that actually makes you feel pretty cool. There is nice enemy variety and you have to bear in mind what the different enemies can do in order to fight them properly. There are a few different weapons which you can use; mainly just to do more damage, but they are there. Like I mentioned earlier, ammuntion is rarely a problem given your pistols have infinite ammo, but I did have to make sure I saved my more powerful weapons for stronger enemies. However, combat also often takes place from a ledge above the arena, where you can wait for Lara to lock onto the enemies and shoot them with pistols until they die. This is often the easiest way to approach combat, and also the least fun.

Overall, this game was pretty disappointing to me. With only three levels left, it really does feel like I should just push through to the end and get the completion, but I just could not be bothered. When I play a game, I want to feel something. But the feeling I experienced when playing Tomb Raider was pretty much exactly the same feeling you get when doing chores. Maybe if I had put on a podcast in the background, I would have had a better time.

era muito criança e só sabia desviar das armadilhas 💔💔

Tomb Raider 1 - Remastered 28 Years Later. A Classic Revisited

There are a few gaming memories that I have interconnected with Tomb Raider despite only playing the game now 28 years after its debut. I can recall while on a family holiday seeing a lady with circular orange-tinted shades and what looked like sporty hiking gear in Majorca Spain which felt completely out of place. Without any knowledge of who Lara was, I just chalked it up to be a unique fashion sense but my dad let out a belly chuckle before rummaging for his yellow disposable tourist camera which felt so light and cheap you wondered how the finished product was going to turn out good at all but it wasn't an everyday occurrence and he knew that this opportunity would never happen again. It was the Lady cosplaying as Lara who saw me and decided to ask if I wanted a picture not knowing who she was was shy and apprehensive as most children and before I could say "NO" much like Lara does when she doesn't know what to do a flash went off and that was it. I'm sure somewhere in a dusty box there are photos of this capturing the awkwardness on my face for all eternity. Nowadays cameras are no longer a novelty, it's become less about rare moments in brief slips of time that are captured and more about vanity exposed for monetary gain through content creation and influencer influenza. There was a certain charm to having photos taken on excursions out and from the Lara cosplayer's perspective there was no incentive to dress up as the heroine except pure admiration of the character, no other angles however how pointy they appeared on a CRT monitor back then. This phenomenon wasn't exclusive to me as years would go by before stumbling upon a video featuring a completely embarrassing exchange between a young boy and Lara on our national broadcast. The Late Late Toy Show is a ritual Irish families indulge in with the lead-up to Christmas that would showcase kids and what they were hoping their parents would buy them or Santa would bring them if they were
good that year. The event was more for the adults laughing at the personalities of these young bucks with an audience of middle-aged to old-age invite-only members who would frequently receive free gifts just for attending. You couldn't be more transparently supercilious to bask in praise from an audience that was being spoonfed gifts periodically throughout and soaking in false praise. The show's facade comes crumbling down with how undeservedly praise is given to the host, it should be judged on its own without self-aggrandizing but alas has been a staple of Irish Television.
It goes against the reserved nature of us Irish people, as many Irish don't like to receive gifts or compliments, we're a candid sort who detest being told nice things.
The falsehood of it shines bright now as an adult but as a child, you couldn't see through that mirage and why would you? With that backstory in place what occurred on one night in particular was nothing short of cringe-worthy.
https://youtu.be/NtHlr9QAzYY
A Paid Lara Croft impersonator poses with fake guns while the plank of wood Pat Kenny does little to break the air in what is an uncomfortable scene for all in attendance and those watching at home. The entire facade shatters, there is no more fake joy and laughs from the audience, just complete embarrassment on display. The Actress isn't to blame but it reflects a deeper and more sinister side to people, how false pretenses can crumble and reveal to all what is truly going on could only happen on Irish TV. The Act fell apart and the result is nothing more spectacular than uncomfortable silence throughout the ordeal. This sticks out in my mind as a defining moment that highlights how the public perceives Lara and the separation between her character to weirdos like Pat Kenny and children who were just playing the game at the time.

Tomb Raider at one point was a pop cultural phenomenon that propelled games from enthusiasts' bedrooms to Hollywood. You couldn't walk through life without hearing her name, seeing her, or even meeting her. This was due in part to the extensive marketing campaigns done that made her the face of the film, perfumes, clothing, and the face of Lucozade.
All the gaming magazines were talking about Lara but there was another side to it all. A B side if you will. There was no question that she was seen as a sex Icon despite the creator's vision of her being an Indiana Jones type in her own regard but it can be impossible to fight back against cultural stereotypes so for the most part they swallowed their pride and let marketing run rampant. What worsened this was the fact magazines pushed a narrative that there was a nude cheat that was hidden and featured screenshots from a fan-made mod that just redrew her textures and skin tone. Not exactly the most riveting piece of pornography, just some pointy polygons but that didn't matter in the late 90s. With the vision of how they intended Lara to be received by people being undermined by the marketing department and burnout from many late nights of overworked conditions many at Core Studios left after the development of the first title.
The money only began to funnel in soon after the passionate folk left which is a shame and the direction of Lara's future would be decided by the remaining team and the prying eyes of Hollywood executive types.

Gameplay:
At its Core Tomb Raider is a strict platformer that requires precision timing, jumps, and most importantly patience. The guns that you have are equipped with unlimited ammunition but that doesn't mean they're the best.
You can obtain weapons such as the shotgun, magnums, and an Uzi earlier by discovering them hidden in levels but you'll probably end up conserving these weapons for such a long time that eventually when the game strips you of them and you have to kill bosses that drop them naturally, the game is almost over. The Uzi floating also looks so out of place in the remaster that it looks less like a secret and more like a bug in the game. The smaller crt and resolution probably masked this but it's not the case here.
Speaking of the remaster differences you can enable modern controls or tank controls and for my playthrough, I had been playing on tank controls and had forgotten there was an option for modern. When I tried the modern controls I wanted to get sick because the game is not designed around them and having full directional control more than often will make you fall and have to repeat jumps so much that it becomes more cumbersome than modern. The updated look of the game is decent but it can't be changed how the level layouts are block based so you'll have modern textures plastered on them that make it look like a Modded Minecraft affair rather than a remaster.
The plus side is Lara looks less like a Neanderthal and more like how she appeared in renders of the time.

Combat wasn't the team's forté and you can tell as the aiming is done automatically by sticking to a nearby enemy which can cause a plethora of issues when dealing with groups of enemies clustered together. One aspect that took me a while to come to grasp was using the R1 button to slowly move Lara back enough from the edge of a block to have enough distance to not fall off without being able to jump.
As for the story, it's barebones and serviceable for a title released in 96 and the remaster keeps the acting and fmvs the exact same so you'll still have that amateur performance with rigid animation. The FMVs have been run through an upscaler and to be honest, do little to nothing except smudge what was already there.
Another slight problem is lighting, the remaster can look dark in several spots that you'll end up swapping to the classic look just to see where you are and what traps are hidden from your view (I've heard this is the case for the later tomb raider games in this collection also).

The game is quite enjoyable at times despite the hard to master controls but once you put time into it you won't have any issue with any of the platforms in the game. Lara's Mansion really should be the first thing you do before even starting the game as it allows a playground for you to master the controls. Modern games don't need to do this because they've homogenised control schemes and player feel for years since the inception of this game that they don't require a tutorial area to familarise oneself with the game feel. The remaster makes a lot of areas pop and the original intent can be seen now unlike the low quality textures that can be hard to makeout what they are supposed to represent at times.


The Worst Levels:
While I enjoyed several levels there are a few that stick out far more than others as a pain in the ass. The 5th level St Francis folly has these giant collums and on the remastered version appears taller ever so slightly than the original graphics (which you can swap to with select) however you will run around attempting to climb without success before leaving the room and going in circles. On a first playthrough, I'd imagine many looked up where to go when stuck as it's not apparent where the correct way to go is at all. The Cistern level can be a loopy situation where you go somewhere too early and then have to repeat the same route that takes over 5 mins to get back to and if you didn't save scum you'd be wasting more time if you fell or died. There's a part in the cistern where you must drain the water in order to be able to stand and pull a switch but it's so remote and disconnected to the adjacent room that it makes no sense to backtrack so far in order to do it that the solution escapes your mind.

Overall Tomb Raider 1 has aged considerably but it's still an important piece of history that will now allow people to delve into it with relative ease with the quality of life features added. The game still requires oodles of patience and if you can make it to the end you'll have a newfound appreciation for taking your time with a game than rushing through it without a second thought. I imagine this was a real test for those who rented it from video stores back in the day to see if they could beat the game before having to re-rent it again. Also having to be wary of the residue that might have been left by the previous player who got stuck on an early level before using the game guide to finish themselves before the game... At the time the likes of crash bandicoot, metal gear solid, Final Fantasy VII, silent hill and other genre defining games were available and as Tomb Raider recieved critical acclaim and sales leading to sequel upon sequel it fell to the wayside forgotten due to advancements in tech and the burn out of the developers who wished to kill the character and series for good after the long run without breaks she had.
While not a sprawling epic like Final Fantasy VII or a tightly knit platformer like Crash, Tomb Raider holds it's own legacy that is a great look back at the time period it was made.
It had it's awkward beginnings before being rebooted in 2013 but hopefully there'll be a redemption coming for the series that shows what the devs originally envisioned for the series and character without the manipulation and distortions caused by those looking to deepen their pockets.

I'll have to give the other ones a go at some point but until then I'm burnt out too and if that's just from playing it, imagine how the devs felt those sleepless nights working on it.


This is the same case as Metroid 1, the remake is so much better that it doesn't make sense to start with that one (I only started out of stubbornness), the problem with this game is the graphics that make it look like you're inside a cave made of poop , the camera which is obviously at the beginning of the 3d era and also the textures that will allow you to know what is graspable and what is not,
the game is so ugly that I can't tell what's entry and what's solid (I don't know), the combat is very slow and sometimes it's hard to know what you're doing and, yeah... I dropped this game at one stage boring with running water where I needed to get 3 contraptions to make something work, but it's that thing I already knew what to do,
but imagine me going to the "right path" taking the contraption without knowing about that thing that makes that other thing appear (maybe that broken bridge) and then I ask myself "okay now what? what do I do, where to go?", yeah very enigmatic and the camera as always doesn't help at all, I tried to get these 3, but it didn't work,
I felt tired in the game and look, I continued and was at that stage and if I continue the game and I'm already tired of that stage it's because there's something wrong with it.

Anyway, just like Metroid 1, play the remake (Anniversary Edition), only play this one out of curiosity or difficult access to the remake.

a atmosfera desse jogo é fenomenal e nenhum jogo da franquia foi capaz de a replicar até agora

Cultural osmosis is a funny thing. I, like many, only know about Lara Croft and her adventures through the media surrounding her, even though we never really played much if any of the games. I myself always had the firm impression that it was some kind of trashy Indiana Jones knock off with a sexy female lead or something of that nature. Probably a bit outdated, coasting on nostalgia for the original PlayStation titles. I had only ever dabbled in some of the PS2 games, seen the first movie, and got roped into playing the 2013 reboot. Admittedly, of my experiences with the franchise, Anniversary, the remake of this first game, was a game I really fell in love with. It's the starting point where my perception of Tomb Raider started to shift into something I became more and more interested in. Critical in the second phase of that process was discovering Youtube channels like the wonderful Steve Of Warr, seriously underrated creator, check him out. He gave me a good old case of talking so passionately about a topic he cares about, that it started to infect me with the energy to become a fan myself. I now really wanted to know what Tomb Raider was all about and why it left such a deep mark on gaming. Lucky for me, I had previously purchased the entire classic series on GOG for like 5 bucks. So I installed the automated PC fix and started Lara's very first adventure.

And just like I wrote in my first impression, I'm really impressed how much I dig this game. I might even go as far as to say that I love it. There is an absorbing atmosphere to the original Tomb Raider I havent felt in any game before. Exploring these locations feels like you're setting foot in places that hasnt been touched by humans in centuries. Both in a beautiful and unnerving way, when the silence is suddenly puncture by the sound of an enemies roar. I can now feel why so many people have childhood nightmare stories of sitting in front of their PS1 only to turn their TV off in horror as a vicious T-Rex suddenly stomps around the corner in Lost Valley. It even got me, despite the fact I knew it was coming. That really extends to all locations, and I can't say that there was a miss across the entire game atmosphere vise. Be it the structures of St. Francis' Folly or the final home stretch in The Great Pyramid, it was all excellent.

You control Lara through these Levels via tank controls. In 2024, a horrifying discovery for some for sure, but quit genius if you look back on what hardware Tomb Raider originally came out on. The PS1 had yet to introduce dual analog sticks and PC was restricted to keyboard and mouse, so you could easily design controls that work for both. In combination with Core Design's decision to structure levels on a strict grid, the game allows for extreme precision platforming while remaining immensely fair. You know at almost all times where Lara will land or how many steps she will take upon pressing the D-pad. The result is a game that delivers everything promised in the opening cutscene, with more freedom of movement than most games today. Combat sadly doesnt met that high water mark, with the limited camera not being able to keep up with enemies that love to poke Lara to death while she's stuck in a corner somewhere. It's by far the worst aspect of Tomb Raider, and by the time I reached Atlantis I was ready to strangle somebody. Atlantis was also the point where I felt a worrying trend come up, of the devs simply hating my guts. The final stretch is an absurd difficulty spike in my opinion, and not for the right reason. Unfair deathtrap after unfair deathtrap, bad enemie spawns, the lava pits.... the lava pits sucked so fucking bad. I still loved the whole design of Atlantis, the gross flesh covered horror Pyramid making me quite uncomfortable. Atlantis in TR1 is unlike any interpretation I have ever seen. Looks amazing, but I sure went back to Lara's Mansion a couple of times, just to decompress after the 100 times I miss timed a jump trying to dodge a flying demon, face plating Lara straight into the next best lava pit. I miss tutorial levels, Lara's mansion is the shit, bring back tutorial levels you cowards!

Finally, of all the things I loved and hated about TR1, there is one thing I still haven't mentioned yet. The actual story of the game. The story really isn't anything. Aside from giving Lara a very well defined character, it's your typical treasure hunt. Lara gets hired by a mysterious millionaire to recover a lost treasure, millionaire turns out to be evil, you beat the evil millionaire and explode her Island. The End. Probably an unfortunate result of inexperience and a short dev cycle. I don't really blame them too much, but I think it says a lot about how they really didn't know what the story was when your Villains' henchman consist of a Lumberjack, an Evil French Man, a Cowboy and a Kid on a Skateboard ? To be fair: Kid with skateboard sliding around the corner, with his Uzis akimbo drawn like he was on his way to assassinate Tupac and Biggie himself, was hilarious. If anything I hope the next game has more kids on skateboards, I would 100% support it. Anyway on to Tomb Raider 2, really looking forward to that game.

Nostalgia is meaningless to me. Useless at best, poisonous at worst. But I like old games. I like the ways in which they are idiosyncratic, coming into existence before dull, insidious ideas about so-called design best practices could shave off the rough edges. Tomb Raider showcases an ingenious and unique solution to third-person navigation in a 3D environment. Every movement Lara makes is exact and if you take the time to learn the controls they will serve you, and the game's level design, perfectly. That level design is what almost single-handedly makes this game great. It requires you to think for yourself. The environment isn't over-telegraphed and the UI isn't intrusive. But it also isn't inscrutable. You'll get lost but if you've been paying attention you won't get frustrated in that process. Tomb Raider respects and trusts the player enough to demand that you pay attention while playing the game. If you can't do that, then why are you here?

levels designed by monkeys


Waaaay better than I expected. Super super super fun, feels like it was way ahead of it's time when it came out! :3

Tank controls intimidate me. Hopefully I can overcome my fears to enjoy this classic with fresh visuals and remastered controls!

This game brought out some sort of primal, chimp rage within me.

It's pretty neat, the level design for most of the game is overall great until around the final level of the Egypt section where some sections are purely just super stretched out platforming sections with no other sauce to speak of. The Atlantis sections are some really cool set pieces though and I thought the boss fights were alright.

My biggest issue with Tomb Raider 1 is how wonky the tank controls are, especially when it comes to platforming, it can be insanely frustrating and can make the game artificially difficult at points, its a pretty big learning curve. The combat is also not one of the game's strongest aspects either.

Besides that, I love the environments, the music, most levels and I especially love Lara. She's so cool...(and hot).


Pretty good!, Kinda dated and controls like shit but...yeah it's cool. Pretty decent level design until the last few levels where things get a bit convoluted. I played it when I was a kid but I didn't remember loads about it. Overall a pretty decent game.