the "friction" in this game is hotly debated but i think a lot of it stems from this fact that this game is pretty fundamentally flawed on a structural level. the insanely stunted fast travel is done entirely on purpose not to instill a sense of adventure in the player, but because walking across dirt roads and fighting the same three enemies is literally the meat of the game. that is the gameplay, and if you don't REALLY fuck with it then you have my pass to give up on it without feeling like you're losing out on your gamer badge of honor. fighting guys does feel really good but its hard not to feel like -- yet again -- im just playing the demo for the actual dragons dogma.

cant say that i or anybody else should be disappointed because a lotta folks are gonna come to find out thats just what dragons dogma is, but if this game is going to continue that tradition then i gotta come to the same conclusion i think a lot of people come to: dragons dogma is really just ok

Reviewed on Apr 06, 2024


3 Comments


23 days ago

I think most of us thought "dragons dogma is a rough, unpolished peek at a greater game" but the people at Capcom thought we thought Dragons Dogma was the greater game, and so they just gave us more of it - and I think thats the sobering realization alot of older fans are coming to. There isnt a greater game, Dragons Dogma might have been a lil bit of an accident.

23 days ago

100%, which is a great shame since Itsuno is insanely goated and i know DD is his baby. i was hoping this game would be the fully realized vision, but it turns out he just wanted to make his ideal game twice

22 days ago

@_YALP This is actually a phenomenal way to sum up my issues with 2.