Reviews from

in the past


Rating this is dumb and anything that could be said about this game save for historical purposes is equally dumb honestly.

Okay let me explain why: HOW THE FUCK DO YOU RATE SOMETHING THAT WAS THE FIRST ONE, IF THERE IS NOTHING TO COMPARE IT WHEN IT WAS CREATED????? In any case this should be used by the standard by it's own nature, otherwise you're just making a very subjective decision that is based on retroactively rating something, which is bad practice even among casual activities cuz that means you can just punish yourself over past mistakes you didn't have a way to know how to avoid, which leads to the own destruction and depression.
Stop looking at the past through the lenses of the present.

You can't get simpler than this. Even I(a chronic idiot) can code this up in twenty minutes with my basic knowledge of Java. And it just works. This version in particular has nothing special about it, altough it looks sleek.

9/10 simple and fun, atleast for a few minutes.

Esse jogo é com certeza pong

Played briefly using the overpriced Atari Mini Pong Jr. plug & play that I bought out of impulse. The moment of realization that I bought a Pong plug & play was so sobering that I ended up selling half my game collection later that year. Buying a stupid thing like that and immediately regretting it is something every young person with financial freedom needs to experience.

Oh, uh, Pong itself. It's table tennis with simplified physics, and it might not look like much, but it helped jumpstart the video game industry. It's not a game I intend to return to, but I can respect its place in history, and you should, too.

O primeiro de todos né, e não envelheceu tão mal quanto outros tantos jogos.

Nota: 7/10 (★★★☆) - Bom


Would be fire if this was 1970

It can be hard to look at Pong now and think it's impressive. When we consider the games we have nowadays, Pong is less than primitive. It is two bars, a square and a scoreboard. This is borderline archaic; but it IS important, and that importance cannot be understated.

I believe in giving games their original context, but even at that, I don't know if I'd have been as impressed with Pong in 1972 as I probably would've been with The Oregon Trail or Computer Space.

they dont make em like they used to! no microtransactions, no dlcs, no expansions, just a masterpiece

GooeyScale: 50/100

YOOOOO ITS FUCKINGGG PONGGGGGGGG