The highest example of realism in simulation games, for better and for worse. This shows us the possibilities of feeling, analyzing and walking around this byzantine simulation and its outcomes, but simultaneously opens these inner workings up to a higher level of scrutiny than more superficial simulations. While the game shoots loftily high, the particular biases of the authors hinder the game from having an interesting theory of history, or from taking the plant-life and larger ecology simulation as seriously as the combat. A work focusing on the development of social forces over time on the scale of dwarf fortress (with its psychology model, and individuals that can be tracked) would be more interesting than something like the victoria series with its purely mechanical and outsider view (which to be fair, dwarf fortress' tracking of the shift from early feudal to late feudal early mercantile production, expansion and centralization of city states and holdings, etc, is somewhat present but the emphasis on the nihilistic unchangedness of the world is hamfisted in), and focusing on the ecology simulation with respect to dwarven production may be able to lead to a less extractive focused simulation. Similarly to the problem of minecraft, the world outside of the player character or dwarves is dead. Like "crystallized thoughts" the natural world marches onward (or in minecraft's case, doesnt move at all) irrespective of man's (or dwarve's) relation to it. Regardless, while not the only way to bring realism to games, this game has carved out a path to it unmatched by any of its emulators.
Outside of this, the actual text of the game has two competing tendencies, and a conservative dressing. There is an attention to the particularity and texture of the various peoples lives, the depiction of beauty in the scope and detail and interconnectedness of it. At the same time there is a rejection of this holding any meaning, that all that exists is pathetic and will be washed away with the ever present threat of madness and mortal fragility of things, foolish pettiness of people, etc. The interplay between these tendencies can be somewhat compelling (there certainly is a lot of foolish repetition of similar mistakes! though not in aggregate of all mankind as the game implies) and acts as a turning wheel through which the dwarves psychology forms. All well and good, however, the threat of fragility and madness falls into a lazy trope of life and civilization being unavoidably cruel and cyclic, clearly stemming from a resignation of the authors grappling with themselves living in a cruel empire that ultimately serves as a gimmick to the persistence of the world as-is. Cities die and leave their presence like demon corpses in doom, scattered across the map in fleshy heaps granting an illusion of persistent influence. But the actual influence of peoples and civilizations upon each other is limited in simulation impact outside of dictionary-like mind entries, names of poetry, family or city affiliations, feeding into a wiki "lore" diving tendency rather than direct relations impacting the games internal economy which has a primary position of the object of the players available verbs (with the exception of books allowing for skill transfer, which largely take a backseat, and artifacts, which function largely as static wealth numbers). Clearly, this nihilistic tendency weighs upon the possibility of the simulation such that the game can come to the predetermined conclusion of no persisting progress and limited historical influence. In this way, the text limits the game and detracts from the strongest points of its own writing.
Finally, we have the inheritance of tolkien. This is the dressing of the game, common to the fantasy genre, of hardly obscured race science. Even going so far as the inclusion of races that have natural inclinations to violence and theft that limits their capacity for industry. This obviously is cartoonishly racist. Addressed in some mods changing the relations between the goblins and dwarves usually band-aids over this at best. A game which attempts to step over dwarf fortress would clearly have to reject this as a premise from the beginning of development, it is simply offensive and unnecessary even within the games own mechanics (which many of the aforementioned modders have long realized) for war and diplomacy, which is the tolkien fantasy races primary function as having de-facto aggressive villains. With most fantasy games, the setting seems largely to be invoked specifically for this purpose, of having a whole race or caste of people that can be gleefully exterminated (see also, BOTW or Elden Ring). If there is to be any saving of fantasy as a setting, this colonial and essentialist writing and mechanical crutch needs to be left far behind and thoroughly criticized in existing works, as well as likely requiring an extensive reworking of many of the assumptions of fantasy itself.
Outside of this, the actual text of the game has two competing tendencies, and a conservative dressing. There is an attention to the particularity and texture of the various peoples lives, the depiction of beauty in the scope and detail and interconnectedness of it. At the same time there is a rejection of this holding any meaning, that all that exists is pathetic and will be washed away with the ever present threat of madness and mortal fragility of things, foolish pettiness of people, etc. The interplay between these tendencies can be somewhat compelling (there certainly is a lot of foolish repetition of similar mistakes! though not in aggregate of all mankind as the game implies) and acts as a turning wheel through which the dwarves psychology forms. All well and good, however, the threat of fragility and madness falls into a lazy trope of life and civilization being unavoidably cruel and cyclic, clearly stemming from a resignation of the authors grappling with themselves living in a cruel empire that ultimately serves as a gimmick to the persistence of the world as-is. Cities die and leave their presence like demon corpses in doom, scattered across the map in fleshy heaps granting an illusion of persistent influence. But the actual influence of peoples and civilizations upon each other is limited in simulation impact outside of dictionary-like mind entries, names of poetry, family or city affiliations, feeding into a wiki "lore" diving tendency rather than direct relations impacting the games internal economy which has a primary position of the object of the players available verbs (with the exception of books allowing for skill transfer, which largely take a backseat, and artifacts, which function largely as static wealth numbers). Clearly, this nihilistic tendency weighs upon the possibility of the simulation such that the game can come to the predetermined conclusion of no persisting progress and limited historical influence. In this way, the text limits the game and detracts from the strongest points of its own writing.
Finally, we have the inheritance of tolkien. This is the dressing of the game, common to the fantasy genre, of hardly obscured race science. Even going so far as the inclusion of races that have natural inclinations to violence and theft that limits their capacity for industry. This obviously is cartoonishly racist. Addressed in some mods changing the relations between the goblins and dwarves usually band-aids over this at best. A game which attempts to step over dwarf fortress would clearly have to reject this as a premise from the beginning of development, it is simply offensive and unnecessary even within the games own mechanics (which many of the aforementioned modders have long realized) for war and diplomacy, which is the tolkien fantasy races primary function as having de-facto aggressive villains. With most fantasy games, the setting seems largely to be invoked specifically for this purpose, of having a whole race or caste of people that can be gleefully exterminated (see also, BOTW or Elden Ring). If there is to be any saving of fantasy as a setting, this colonial and essentialist writing and mechanical crutch needs to be left far behind and thoroughly criticized in existing works, as well as likely requiring an extensive reworking of many of the assumptions of fantasy itself.