I got mix feelings with this one, nearly every positive aspect of previous RPG AC games (Odyssey and Origins) are way better, but every negative one is way worse, the story is double the hrs of Odyssey, and is as repetetive as Origins, with a couple of really good moments, but they're few and far between, the fact that it was divided into sagas helped the pace of the game , so the player remembers more of each individual story, the mythologic part is way more present and felt more out of place, the combat is much better, more brutal and with a little more depth, but the RPG systems are water down for the worse, inlcuding stats and dialogue option. It has everything but nothing stands out, it tries to be a more "classic" AC but also a continuation of the RPG formula, and nails neither. It has a lot of content if you care about that, multiple DLCs and free content added later.

Maybe my Favorite AC, from the solid story to the peak naval combat that somehow is 100 times better than most "naval" combat focus games today (aka Skull n Bones). The worst part is by far the one to one combat, and a the repetetive mission structures (tail this tail that) oh boy do they sucks, the combat it's a worse and buggier version of the AC3, that was already pretty simple compare to previous and future games, and half the missions follow the worst parts of all AC games, you're either tailing someone or eardroping someone half the time.