4 reviews liked by Unread50


Are we so gullible? Do we as an audience not demand anything from our art? There's no story, no new mechanics, no real characters, no interesting or enjoyable visuals, no compelling gameplay, no original ideas at all in fact. Is a faceless strawman to antagonise really enough to get millions of people to play an Unreal Engine asset flip made as artlessly as possible? Is no one else actively disturbed by how blatantly and gracelessly this rips mechanics from every popular game of the last 2 decades, without integrating any of them together whatsoever? Has art ever felt this cynical before?

Feel free to discount my opinion. I am a 'salty Pokemon fanboy' after all, and I only gave this game an hour or so of my not particularly highly valued time. I personally just prefer the art I engage with to care for the art form it sits within, even a little bit. Palworld hates video games. It sees nothing more within them than a collection of things to do and hopes that by shovelling a flaccid farcical version of as many of them as possible into your mouth it will somehow constitute a 'video game' when all is said and done. It doesn't. I'm deeply saddened that so many gamers think so lowly of our art form that they genuinely think this is acceptable.

as with any old multiplayer game (especially by ea), support is minimal, most of the remaining playerbase is racist and you will probably have some sessions where you get nothing but hacker lobbies. that being said, this game is like crack, have never gotten into a battlefield as much as this. funnily enough, ww1 is a great setting for vehicle balance and map design. constantly exciting, easy to jump into and still the most active battlefield to date. highly recommend

one of my favourite shooters ever made, no other game in the series gives off the same vibe as the first installment

this is actually like, way better than the base game. what the fuck