66 Reviews liked by Dragoture


Unsufferable. One of the worst experiences of my life.

Just jump, man, it's not so difficult, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE A MONSTER HUNTER.

History books say Christopher Belmont carried heavy rocks in his pockets for good luck, making him the slowest member of his bloodline. Exploiting this weakness, Dracula filled his castle with narrow platforms requiring pixel-perfect jumps to traverse.

A pretty mediocre Castlevania game made even worse by how slow it runs. Basically unplayable.

can she climb those fucking ropes ANY slower

the one Castlevania game starring a female Belmont, and it's so bad that Igarashi took it away from Canon lmao

I did not enjoy this game. Everything about it was a step back from all the previous Castlevania entries. The removal of sub weapons, ear-grating music, lackluster graphics, respawning enemies, and overly-long levels make this one hard to recommend even to die hard fans.

Everything about this is bad. The other CastleVanias I've played are much better.

I know i should cut it some slack since its a gameboy game, but MAN it looks ugly

I haven't seen this many bats since Pokemon Red

worse than the adventure

it tries to be SoTN but it isn't. it's painfully boring and numb

This is really boring and not that fun

Before being retconned out of the series chronology, Castlevania: Legends used to be the very first game in the series' timeline. It features the first incarnation of Count Dracula as well as the first Belmont, Sonia Belmont, to rise against him. For what would be a pivotal game in the series chronology, it's... definitely one of the Castlevania games ever made.

The Game Boy and Game Boy Color were filled with boneless, unambitious platformers, be them licensed games or attempts to bring home console franchises to the portable, and Castlevania: Legends is one more game in that latter pile, featuring uninspired level and enemy design, a janky, barebones implementation of traditional series mechanics and encounters that are an exercise in frustration. It has a very short runtime, but even so, it's better off being skipped.

It's a shame, too, because it features a female protagonist, whose appearance on the cover of the game was what drove me to try it in the first place. Sonia is pretty cool, it's just that her game is... not. I do enjoy the implication in the best ending that she had a son, Victor Belmont, with Alucard, thus forever tying the Belmont bloodline to Dracula. My gal literally doomed her entire bloodline to get a piece of that gorgeous dhampir, which... based and goals? Mad respect for her.

Besides, just think about it: had Legends stayed canon (which in my heart, it did), it would recontextualize every one of Alucard's appearances as him looking out for his great great great great grandchildren. "Richter, get down from that throne, you're going to hurt yourself". "Trevor, take an adult with you to fight grandpa's dad, okay?". I can only assume Iga struck the game out of the continuity because he was too afraid of how powerful such a narrative would be.

i almost cried, it's crazy how much of a difference fully voiced social links makes, the cast and dialogue is sooooo much better than p5r and even if tartarus isn't as fun as palaces it's nowhere near as bad as you'd think, can't wait for the answer in september i should finally play 4 in the meantime frfr!!

Already knew what the ending was and still ended up crying anyways. This game while being a remake still hits in whole new ways from when I played Persona 3 FES.