What was initially a fascinating rabbit hole of interpreting a fictional game developer's oeuvre by examining key symbols & psyche, eventually turned into woefully brushing over decades of inner workings of artists turned into art & how a viewer can digest it. The game's message isn't inherently wrong for it is ultimately a work of how one can connect to art, but I cannot find myself to agree with what is suggested throughout.

Keep in mind, one does not necessarily have to unravel hidden meanings & deeper symbolic gestures in every piece they come across. Sometimes, it's even better to simply feel the emotive gall of a piece of art. Furthermore, the game indirectly suggests that a form of projection is taking place when overanalyzing art at times. To that, I have to say: correct. But this is what art is all about. Art, whatever your interpretation of it may be, is almost always a discussion between the artist & the viewer. It is a two-sided (sometimes more) dialogue that pricks at thee heart & mind in such a way that is ultimately life affirming.

Dave means well with this game. After all, it's one in which you could ultimately interpret, perhaps against his own wishes, that he himself is attempting to purge this state of thinking while experiencing art itself. But the "games" in this suggests that there is something going on underneath the surface of the creator in the metafiction here (aside of course, from literal symbolism that Dave is projecting into Coda's own games). By simply creating something, one is shedding skin for the audience to witness. One central message that Dave conveys is that an artist does not owe their audience anything, & to assume what the artist is experiencing when creating something without having a single idea what that might be can be dangerous. A cyclone of sorts forms, one that can potentially create a parasocial relationship with an artist that may be more dangerous than helpful.

Suffice it to say, a fair amount of points that Dave suggests in this game are not necessarily damaging to art or how we experience it (I generally disagree with them, but at times they hold some weight), but it all quickly becomes relatively disingenuous by the mere act of Dave purposefully going out of their way to create fictional games that seemingly have no meaning whatsoever. By the end, the mere existence of this game contradicts the point its trying to make, to some extent.

But maybe I'm only proving Dave's point. So be it.