Look, I know this isn't high art redefining the medium, but even as someone who's never listened to 50 Cent I can't deny that this is a pretty fun game. It's incredibly stupid but that's also what makes it so entertaining. Even the often pretty mediocre voice acting just adds to the vibe.

That's not to say the game isn't well made. Shooting mechanics, the scoring system that rewards players with bonus weapons like explosive handgun rounds, the way containers pop open to reveal their loot - all of it works together nicely in creating a game that's not interested in wasting the player's time or striving for realism. You bought the 50 Cent video game, so now you get to play as 50 Cent, shooting bad guys while listening to his music; that bitch got your diamond covered skull, better get it back! Games like Gears of War ultimately edge out Blood on the Sand in terms of content and variety, but those were also prestige Xbox games made with a way higher budget.

What somewhat drags the game down are a couple of minor bugs, the repetitive environments (brown Middle Eastern/North African city, never saw that one in a game before), and the same helicopter boss fight repeated 3-4 times throughout the game.

Still, if you're a fan of 50 Cent, you should absolutely get this, and even if you're not, the game is worth a try if the idea of a short 3rd-person-shooter that's not taking itself too serious sounds appealing. I wish there were more games like this, I love those short but memorable AA experiences we used to get back then. Give me more of that, maybe even with some other artists: Taylor Swift flight sim, Olivia Rodrigo FPS, the possibilities are endless...

This might genuinely be the worst game ever made. Firstly, it's terrible in all the usual categories: the plot is generic, gameplay isn't fun, performance and graphics are awful, even the subtitles often flat out don't work and sometimes sound effects and music are straight up missing.

But hey, other games are terrible too - what makes Blackwater so unique is its message, the reason for why it exists: This is a barely disguised propaganda game advertising a group of war criminals. Devil May Cry 2 might be a terrible game, but at least the people who produced it didn't shoot a 9 year old in the head. The fact that a company like Blackwater was even able to find a developer willing to work with them is sickening, and I can't fathom how Microsoft and game journalists at the time thought this was a normal thing to release.

This is an evil game and even if it actually was fun I couldn't recommend it to anyone. Unless you're interested in the culture that made the release of such a product possible there's no reason to ever touch this.

While the combat is not quite as varied as in God of War 3, Ghost of Sparta easily makes up for this with its story. It's surprising to see a PSP spin-off dive deeper into Kratos' character than the mainline games ever did. It's great to see Kratos in a non hostile environment for once (if only for a couple of minutes), and one can even spot a lot of elements that would become much more prominent in the later PS4 era titles.

What holds the game somewhat back is the way it treats its antagonists. Whereas Zeus and Ares both get entire games worth of build up, the main antagonist in Ghost of Sparta appears only a couple minutes before the climactic boss fight against him starts. I don't think the middle part of Ghost of Sparta drags as much as the one in GoW 2 did, but I still think it could've been put to better use to flesh out Kratos' opponents.

The PS3 port is also fairly mediocre. I'm assuming that it runs better than on the PSP, but there's still tons of screen tearing, stuttering, and the game even crashed once (this might be due to my disc copy as the game froze up right when a cutscene was supposed to start). The controls also fail to make use of all the buttons available, as more than one action is bound onto single buttons - a layout that might have made sense on a PSP, but feels clunky on the PS3.

Technical issues aside, this is one of the better Greek God of War games and definitely worth playing. Despite being released after God of War 3, try to play it before playing 2 and 3, otherwise some of the dialogue in 3 won't make sense to you.

I know the yellow piss filter and the washed out colors popular back in 2006 get a lot of flack, but how else are you supposed to simulate the existential horror of existing in the UK?

I've barely seen anyone talk about this game, and when it comes up it's mostly to point out that Resistance is one of the few early PS3 games that made you feel like perhaps you didn't just waste 600 bucks on a console with no games. That's a shame, because Fall of Man is a fairly unique shooter experience. If we imagine a spectrum between fast paced old-school shooters like Doom or Quake and the more modern "you can only carry 2 guns and everything is hitscan" Call of Duty clones, then Resistance sits right in the middle.

Health regenerates, but only in increments and health packs are needed for everything beyond that. Movement isn't as fast as in Quake, but you can still carry the entire weapon arsenal around and the focus is less on sitting behind cover and more on pushing forward. It's a nice mixture and serves as a reminder of just how much damage Modern Warfare did to the FPS genre.

Unfortunately, the game struggles in the difficulty/balancing department. I appreciate a challenge, but Resistance takes things slightly too far. The Chimera are aggressive to a degree rarely seen in shooters, often pushing forward or throwing grenades when players try to hide behind cover. In the game's best moments this leads to tense situations in which players need to quickly dispatch enemies, always staying in motion and choosing the weapon most adequate for a specific range or enemy. In its worst moments, an enemy grabs the player character and you can do nothing but shake your controller (it's a launch title so of course there's some dumb movement feature) and watch in horror as half your health bar disappears. Oh, did I mention there's an enemy type able to shoot through cover? Good idea in theory, but awfully balanced. Finishing the game on easy was already brutal, I doubt anyone could play through this on hard without having a bit of helpful Chimera DNA inside them as well.

What made me continue playing was the game's setting. There's a brutal hopelessness on display here that's rarely seen in games. Half the world is already conquered by monsters, the only hope left is a single man who's half alien himself, and even if you somehow succeed the world will still be in ruin. Add to this the amazing mixture of alternate history retro-futurism paired with horrific alien laboratories and you end up with a fairly unique and equally bleak atmosphere.

At first I considered the protagonist to be underdeveloped, but as I played more I realized this is most likely intentional. You might be playing as Nathan Hale, but he's not the one telling the story. Instead, his story is recounted by a British intelligence officer trying to piece together the journey Hale went on. You don't know what Hale is thinking, but that's because Rachel Parker doesn't either. I don't think that Resistance fully utilizes the possibilities of this approach to story telling, but it's still nice to see an established player character whilst also leaving players the opportunity to draw their own conclusions.

Resistance is a game I can pretty much only recommend to those already experienced with console shooters - its difficulty is simply too brutal, although to Insomniac's credit, it runs incredibly smooth for a PS3 game. If you don't mind a challenge and are into retro sci-fi/horror, definitely go for it. This is one of the cheapest PS3 games I've seen and widely available.

This is a pretty mediocre remaster that adds little besides a new photo mode. Everything that looked good in the PS3 original still looks great, while some of the character models could've used an overhaul. I also encountered two minor graphical errors during my playthrough, although those might be due to the PS5 backwards compatibility mode.

Luckily, God of War 3 is still as much fun as it was on the PS3. Combat has a wonderful flow, the game is lengthy but without any filler content, and there's just so much variety here. The previous games left a surprising amount of gods and titans alive for Kratos to battle, which he does in a series of incredible set pieces, wielding a ton of different weapons.

However, what keeps me from fully recommending this game is the way it treats its female characters. The God of War games were always edgy, but to a point where it's so stupid you can't help but laugh. Ripping off a god's head to use as a flashlight is metal as fuck, and Kratos interrupting his quest for vengeance to sleep with Aphrodite has to be one of the dumbest QTEs ever.

Unfortunately, God of War 3 doesn't seem to know the word restraint. Roughly in the middle of the game, Kratos encounters a half naked and chained up woman. The game heavily implies that the woman has been abused and most likely raped by her former lover Poseidon. Kratos grabs the woman, shoves and throws her through half the level all while she screams for mercy, and ultimately ends up throwing her into a mechanism, crushing her to death - all of this to open a door btw. I don't mind Kratos being an edgelord, but the scene is never reflected upon and seems insanely cruel. I don't even want to imagine how female devs working at the studio felt when their superiors came up with this scene.

All in all God of War 3 is still fantastic game - just be aware what you're getting in terms of some of its more problematic content...

Let's get the obvious out of the way first: the game looks incredible, especially for a Vita game. This wouldn't look out of place on a PS3, perhaps not even on the Nintendo Switch. Mercenary does exhibit heavy frame rate drops in some levels, but it running on 2011 mobile hardware is a miracle in itself, so I won't complain too much.

Despite its short length it's also a contender for best Killzone campaign. The game takes place during the events of the first two Killzone games, taking the player to the locations of both games and offering lots of level variety in the process. Players are also free to choose how they approach most situations and can buy guns and equipment supporting their respective styles. Stealthily taking out commanders even yields additional lore bits and currency rewards. There's tons of different weapons and shooting them feels great. I didn't even mind the touchscreen minigames and QTEs since they work so well, way better than rotating the controller did in the console games.

The story's great too. In my other reviews, I criticized the earlier Killzone games for not building onto the tone and stories their predecessors established. Mercenary manages to nicely tie the stories of Killzone 1 and 2 together, even offering a unique perspective since you play as, well, a mercenary. The protagonist and his allies generally aren't constrained by annoying things such as loyalty or basic ethics - they're in it for the money.

Not only does the game make both sides of the ongoing war seem morally gray, it also ties this into the gameplay. Ammo costs money, so you better loot it off the people you killed instead of buying it. Got shot and died? Now you get a (very very slight) punishment in the form of a "life insurance" payment taken from your account. Accidentally blew yourself up like an idiot? Suicide costs twice as much. But don't worry, both sides of the conflict will happily pay you for all the people you killed and things you destroyed. It's perhaps the most cynical the series ever got and I appreciate what the game is trying here, even though it sometimes suffers from the short length of its story - it's hard to flesh out characters when they're only around for less than 4 hour.

If there are, by some miracle, still Vita owners out there that haven't played Mercenary, they should at least try it. It's not only a masterclass in pushing the system to its limits, it's also a great game on its own that I would happily play on a bigger screen, provided Sony ever again allows Guerilla to work on something not called Horizon.

This must've been quite the experience on the PSP, but playing it on a PS3 makes it look like a somewhat generic game. It released after God of War 2, even though it partially sets up the events of that game, but looks worse and lacks both set pieces and impressive boss fights.

There's also a lack of interesting additions to the combat or gameplay in general, and the whole game is not very well balanced: slightly past the midway point I had fully upgraded every weapon, as well as my health and mana bar. That's not to say the combat is bad, it's fun, but it has a very "been there, done that" feel to it.

On a more positive note, I appreciate the absence of the insanely difficult QTEs that were common in God of War 1 and 2. Some of the environment art is great too, although repetitive. The story is somewhat predictable, but still manages to flesh out Kratos as a character.

Nevertheless, I could never shake the feeling that the reason this game exists was purely to get a God of War game on the PSP. There's just not enough there in the graphics, story, or gameplay department to make it feel like an important entry in the series. If you're interested in playing it, at least try to do so before playing God of War 2.

Look I'd love to just write "we have Modern Warfare at home" and end it there, but no, Medal of Honor 2010 is waayyy worse.

Good things first: The score is actually great and I wish it was part of a better game. Same applies to the Linkin Park song used during the credits (what's up with Linkin Park being everywhere during the late 00s?). There's a single mission I enjoyed, and I guess the gunplay is occasionally serviceable, at least when it's not ruined by the weird mouse input.

Everything else is just varying degrees of awful. Unlike the long dead multi-player part, the campaign runs on Unreal Engine 3 and looks exactly like you'd expect a generic military fps in this engine to look: incredibly ugly, almost as ugly as the ui. The game's story is similarly generic and an incoherent mess filled with stereotypical characters.

As if all of that wasn't bad enough, the game is also very buggy. I'm not talking about the occasional animation bug or flickering texture, no, this game will force you to replay entire mission! Occasionally, your teammates will get stuck on level props and not move any further. Doesn't sound that bad when you consider how stupid their ai is, but once you reach the next scripted event, the game will not proceed since one of the NPCs needed to trigger the script is missing - you're stuck.

In a case like that, even loading a checkpoint won't work, since a lot of the time the NPC got stuck before the checkpoint save was created and will still be stuck upon reloading, somewhere in a now inaccessible part of the level. Just imagine having to constantly keep track of all the soldiers running around in Call of Duty, or Elizabeth in Bioshock, just in case they get stuck... I had to replay not one, but TWO missions because of this bug! Including the final fucking mission of the game in its entirety, since the script that didn't trigger was what was keeping me from the final cinematic and the end of the game!

It gets worse: the game's story has aged incredibly awful. This is a game that portrays the fucking War in Afghanistan as a noble cause fought by heroic US troops that they'd surely win, if it wasn't for those evil bureaucrats in Washington. The game has the audacity to make you conquer Bagram airbase during a mission, a place that would later be used as a prison, with the Red Cross reporting multiple human rights violations, including inmates being tortured. The devs couldn't have known how the overall situation in Afghanistan would ultimately develop, but the Bagram prison torture had already been reported on for years when the game came out in 2010. Reactions at the time of release were more focused on the fact that the multi-player let players play AS THE FUCKING TALIBAN, which I still cannot believe is something that made it into a commercially released game.

This game is a buggy, incoherent mess, dragged down even further by its absolutely tone deaf political messaging. Unless you want to see how bad it is for yourself, or you're looking into it for research purposes, I genuinely don't see a reason for anyone to play this.

Hades is a fantastic game, don't get me wrong. However, finishing it before the Hades 2 release (or at least playing up to the ending credits), I also saw some of the flaws in it.

While there is a wide variety of viable builds, some are just more efficient than others. Once I had finished a few runs and got closer to the ending, I found myself having to choose between established builds that work well but get boring over time, or more experimental builds that could potentially cost me the run in the last third. I found it hard to "trust the process" since some boons are just way too useful not to use all the time.

Again, this is a very specific criticism, and one I didn't have early one. The game's story progression does a wonderful job at always giving you new dialogue to listen to, even when you fail a run. In fact, the voice acting and story are simply incredible, even outside the context of the game's progression.

I also love the overall approach to Greek mythology and the colorful artstyle. Both Hades and the new God of War games have similar, often quite serious themes, but I enjoy how Hades still manages to embrace some of the more lighthearted aspects of the mythology.

Overall, Hades is an easy recommendation for anyone even remotely interested in roguelikes, action games, Greek myths, and/or bisexuality.

Fallout 1's age is hard to overlook. I couldn't even start the game at first and then once I got the game running in compatibility mode, selecting my monitor resolution would instantly crash the game. I won't blame the original devs for this, but I will criticize the now Microsoft owned Bethesda for marketing and selling a game in this state.

Luckily, there exists a mod that ports the entirety of Fallout 1 into 2, which I used for my playthrough. It includes a number of quality of life features, like having more than 10 save slots and easier inventory management. The ui is still not very intuitive and also fairly clunky, but you can get used to it, even though some elements must've already been confusing in 1997.

Fallout 1 shines when exploring the world. Everything feels cohesive, there's simply a great sense of place and realism. The wasteland feels brutal and the game mechanics emphasize that, although it certainly takes some getting used to. While the Bethesda games are always build so that a player going into the exact opposite direction of the main quest will stumble upon something interesting, players venturing into the wrong direction at the start of Fallout 1 will most likely be instakilled by a random encounter with super mutants.

Even later on and equipped with better gear, a single critical hit can instantly kill the player character. It's annoying, sure, but it also makes the world believable. The lack of quest direction works similarly: it's confusing when compared to later games, but then again, why would anyone know where to find a working water chip in a radioactive desert? The only time I was actually disappointed by the game's logic was when I encountered a second time limit, which unlike the earlier water chip deadline was hidden from the player.

While I did immensely enjoy the writing, characters, story, and possible quest outcomes, I found the combat pretty boring. It's turn based, but positioning is pretty much irrelevant since everyone uses ranged weapons anyway and there's no cover. All players can do is shoot at enemies and occasionally reload or use a stim pack. Other turn based RPGs offer deep mechanics and choices while Fallout 1's combat only made me wish for a speed up option.

All in all, playing through Fallout 1 was still a worthwhile experience. I don't think that I'll ever play it again, but getting to play it myself and finally see where the whole franchise started was great. Hopefully Bethesda will eventually release a version with better compatibility with modern systems, so others can experience the game without having to install mandatory mods.

The Xbox One's focus on TV over classical video games is widely accepted as one of the key factors that cost Microsofts the last console generation. Quantum Break almost feels like the embodiment of every weird idea Microsoft executives came up prior to the console's launch: It's a third-person-shooter that periodically interrupts its gameplay with TV show episodes detailing what the story's villains were up to.

In my opinion, the concept doesn't even sound that good on paper, and the execution is severely flawed. The live-action parts barely hide the lack of budget, with scenes often taking place in hallways, stairwells, and warehouses. The first episode is the worst offender in that regard, presenting the viewer with boring locations and offensively uncharismatic characters. Later episodes improve somewhat and the high profile actors manage to deliver on the acting side of things, but that doesn't change the fact that I only continued watching because the game expected me to.

Weirdly enough, the ingame parts look way better than the TV show. Setpieces are bigger and even lighting is improved. The TV show parts feel claustrophobic and held back in comparison. The game also already has a lot of slower paced narrative segments in its ingame parts, with lots of slow walking while listening to exposition and rooms upon rooms filled with text, video, and audio collectibles.

Unfortunately, Quantum Break doesn't manage to use all those narrative tools to create a compelling story. Things are happening, but between all the clichés and tropes (an evil corporation secretly plotting and taking over a city, never heard that one before) it's hard to find a reason to actually care about what's going on. Even worse, a lot of plot points have appeared in movies like Back to the Future or Terminator before, but where handled much better. Plus, the atmosphere is not nearly as thick as in other Remedy titles.

That leaves us with the actual gameplay. Puzzles are even easier than those in Life is Strange, consisting mainly of holding down a button or following a yellow cable. Platforming feels terrible. Jack will try to climb pretty much anything when you press the corresponding button, I'll give him credit for that, but a lot of the time he gets stuck on environmental objects or fails jumps necessary to progress.

Fortunately, combat is pretty fun. Jack doesn't have a lot of health, so relying on his powers is necessary to win. Those supernatural powers are all very loosely related to time (it's not a bomb or shield, it's time bomb and time shield) and feel powerful, especially when used against standard enemies. Mechanics never get too complex, but they don't need to for such a short game. There's very heavy auto aim, and since the game is clearly optimized for a controller, I'd recommend using one.

With the good and bad mentioned, that leaves us with the ugly: the game is not in a state that I would consider polished. The Windows Store version never received the latest updates, and even the patched Steam version still has major animation bugs. Reload animations dont even remove the magazine, and weapons teleport in and out of hands in cutscenes. Annoyingly, the final boss fight is an incomprehensible mess that covers everything in effects and even focuses the camera on areas players should run away from (making you run towards the screen).

By default, the game also uses horrible upscaling, rendering at two thirds of the display resolution with terrible results. While upscaling can be disabled in the settings, many of the other heavily featured post processing effect are mandatory, meaning the game often looks worse than it would without. Colors are washed out and greyish, it's just not pleasant to look at. The streaming quality of the cutscenes is also debatable. Aiming for streaming in a high resolution is great, but the stream starts buffering even on fast connections, with no option to download the TV show episodes. I also wonder how long the servers for this game will remain online - in a worst case scenario, half of the product will be missing in a couple of years.

Out of all the Remedy games I've played, Quantum Break was clearly the worst, and I doubt it'll ever get the sequel its ending set up. There's still Remedy DNA in here, but I have a hard time recommending the game over the studios' other works or other third-person-shooters like Max Payne 3 or Uncharted.

The original version of the first Uncharted game was the first game I ever played on my PS3, back in 2017. I was fairly late to the party, having only played PC games before finally got a PS3 to check out all the exclusives I kept hearing about. As a fan of Indiana Jones and Tomb Raider, Uncharted was the natural starting point.

I'd love to say that I instantly fell in love with the series - except I didn't. I was under the impression that I'd get to experience a globe trotting adventure, but the game mostly took place on a single island with repetitive environments. The jungle Drake traversed didn't even look that great, didn't this come out the same year as the first Crysis?! The game's atrocious performance didn't help it's case either.

In hindsight, I was perhaps too harsh on the game. Knowing more about the PS3's particular architecture, I can now recognize Uncharted as the impressive game that it was. It's also a noticeable step towards the cinematic presentation Naughty Dog games are known for today, although still fairly reliant on video game tropes.

That's not to say the writing is bad, the opposite is the case. All three leads feel like fully formed characters, and none of them are stereotypically "good guys". Elena suprised me again and again on my second playthrough, for example when she remarked that she wishes she had her camera with her after finding the body of an impaled soldier. She even pushes Drake to continue the hunt for the treasure when he's about to give up, a very welcome reversal of the role women often have in these adventure stories.

The story is campy at times, which I quite enjoyed. Some plot points border on the supernatural, and I wish the insanity of fighting off zombie-like creatures with Nazi machine guns had carried on into some of the later sequels. I'm genuinely suprised the game still carries a Teen rating considering some of the content in the game.

Combat is much more enjoyable in this remastered version, mainly because of the jump to a more stable 60 fps (the original often struggled with reaching 30). It's perhaps not as polished as Gears of Wars' combat loop was on the competing 360, but still a lot of fun. Guns feel powerful, especially the shotgun and Desert Eagle. Both send enemies flying backwards in a hilariously over the top fashion. Melee combat feels underdeveloped in comparison, but is thankfully optional.

It is worth mentioning that Uncharted can be a pretty brutal game at times. I opted for the second lowest difficulty ("easy") and found the challenge mostly enjoyable, but I can imagine that on normal or higher, things look different. Enemies with laser targeting always kill in a single hit, and enemies carrying a grenade launcher also occasionally one shot me.

Climbing, the other half of the core gameplay, is fairly simplistic and linear. Some of the climbable ledges can be a bit hard to spot due to the heightened detail of the remaster, but it's almost impossible to get stuck due to the hint system. Nate's jump distance seems to vary depending on the set piece and it often feels like he's dragged towards ledges during jumps, making it occasionally difficult to judge whether he can reach certain spots. I've also had the game bug out on me at one point, with Nate repeatedly not grabbing a ledge.

Boosts in resolution and frame rate aside, the most obvious improvements of the remaster have to be the reworked environments. There are more plants, making the jungle seem more densely grown, and textures see resolution boosts. As for the negatives, the game's lighting is often flat, especially noticeable in cutscenes. Faces often lack self-shadows and seem almost waxen at times. The game does certainly look better when compared to the original, but it's far removed from from the likes of Uncharted 4.

All in all, I've had a fun time with this remastered version. The game is fairly short and the writing and shooting mechanics kept me engaged throughout. At the same time, the series has come a long way and the novelty the game had in 2007 has worn off over time, making its flaws more visible.

I didn't have a great time with Remake, so I was very surprised when I realized how much I was actually enjoying this Yuffie focused DLC. It fixes pretty much every single issue I had with the main game! Pacing is improved, the story feels more focused, and Yuffie's moveset is just so much fun. Even movement outside of combat felt greatly improved, and destroying chests with throwable shurikens was satisfying all the way through.

I didn't mind the removal of controllable party members, mostly because I didn't really enjoy playing as them anyway. Yuffie having a broad range of melee and ranged options from the start felt great, and only having one companion made the battles much easier to read, as the abundance of particle effects became a thing of the past.

Even though the DLC isn't overly long, it still managed to make me fall in love with Yuffie and her companion Sonon. Don't get me wrong, Cloud is a great character, but after 20 hours of him grunting, shrugging and acting disinterested I was happy to play as the more cheerful Yuffie. I even got pretty emotional towards the end, something the main game didn't really accomplish outside of one or two scenes. The soundtrack is incredible too and felt much more varied in terms of genre than the OST of the main game did, excellently complementing Yuffie's personality.

There are also a couple of side quests, but none of them managed to really grab my attention. Other players might have a better time with the RTS Fort Condor minigame, but I found myself quickly overwhelmed and the tutorial wasn't that great. Even tho I won matches, I wasn't sure what I did right, so eventually I just stopped bothering with it.

My only other point of criticism concerns the graphics. Don't get me wrong, the DLC looks great, but texture and model quality seemed to be slightly lower than in the main game. Considering that this piece of content was never released for the PS4 version of the game, I kept looking for areas or setpieces that graphically set Episode Intermission apart from the main game, and I just couldn't find anything that'd be impossible on the older generation. Even though I only played Remake on the PS5, this release strategy felt scummy to me.

Despite not having played the original, I was still aware of the overall structure and a few important plot points. I also knew that Remake wouldn't be a 1 for 1 remake of the original, and is rather a mix of remake, reboot, and sequel centered around the first 4-5 hours of VII; in that regard, it's perhaps best compared to the Evangelion Rebuild movies. The game's storyline has been extended and another very meta plot thread has been added as well. Essentially, you're not getting Final Fantasy VII, you're getting something completely new.

Now, judging the quality of what you're getting is surprisingly difficult. Starting off with the positives, the presentation is one of the best you'll find in the entire RPG genre. Cutscenes have a movie like quality to them, and in-engine cutscenes are near indistinguishable from the few pre-rendered ones. Character models look incredible, particle effects are beautiful, and the world design is on point as well. Some low resolution textures have made their way into the ps5 version, but they're so rare mentioning them feels like nitpicking.

It's when the beautiful character models start talking that issues arise. The localization is surprisingly weak and suffers from what I can only describe as "dubbed anime syndrome": Lots of gasps, "huh"s, and "you guys". It doesn't help that the story is moving pretty slowly a lot of the time, mostly due to being being stretched out. A couple of nice additions can't hide that a lot of what's here is pure and simple filler. There's a lengthy section set in a sewer system, followed by a abandoned warehouse/junkyard section. Both have to be some of the most boring settings you can put in a video game, and you have to return to the same sewer section a second time later in the game.

I'm also not really fond of the additional story content centered around the whispers. I always found that everything about them was way less interesting than what was going on with the actual plot of the game. They also make the Remake, ironically, a bad starting place for newcomers, as some familiarity with the original's story is necessary to fully understand this meta storyline. I'm more fond of the other, more character focused, extensions. VII has always been beloved for its characters, so spending more time with them and getting to know them better was great.

Less great is the core gameplay loop itself. Ignoring a few inconsequential side quests that take place across slightly more open hubs, the bulk of the game is incredibly linear. In the game's best moments, the presentation and momentum of the story easily covers this up. In its worst moments you're running through a sewer and quickly realize that what you're actually doing is: beat up a few rats, walk down a corridor, climb a ladder, walk down another corridor, beat up a few more rats, climb down a ladder, go down another corridor. It's not just that it's boring, it's also that a lot of those sections take place in generic looking areas. Midgar as a setting offers so much, but too often Cloud and his companions end up on metal walkways or in linear hallways in concrete filled environments.

Combat keeps things from getting too dry, but there's still room for improvement here. The camera struggles occasionally, flying enemies are hard to track, and it's never quite as responsive as you'd want it to be. The amount of particle effects also makes it hard to see what's actually going on. Especially when fighting human bosses, sparks, lightning, and fire effects tend to cover up Cloud and his opponent, making players more or less guess who is currently beating up who. A lot of the enemies also have attacks that freeze or paralyze Cloud and while I can see that this was most likely supposed to encourage switching to other characters, it's not a fun mechanic in my eyes. Combining action gameplay with a tactical ATB like system was a great idea, but especially after playing Final Fantasy XVI the action side just feels lacking.

I know that my review sounds rather negative, but that doesn't mean that I hate Remake. I'm infuriated by it, but not because it's bad, rather because there's so much good here that I hate to see it dragged down by the bad. Most of my criticisms are more or less based on the decision to only remake the Midgar part of the game. Little is resolved here, almost nobody dies (because you're technically only 20% into the story), everything feels stretched and repeated. This game desperately needed to be cut down, and I don't think anyone would complain if the sewer parts were shortened or if Sephiroth had less of his cryptic but ultimately meaningless appearances.

Still, Remake got me hooked. I don't want to play it again any time soon, but I'm not done with Final Fantasy VII. I want to play the original game and once I'm done with that, I also want to play Rebirth. Remake made me fall in love with the characters, and by extension also the universe they inhabit. So even if I never touch Remake again, that's something I'll always be thankful for.

A terrible release all around. The core gameplay is still fun, but that's due to the work Pandemic did 20+ years ago. All Aspyr did was AI upscale the textures, add a few reflections to surfaces, and port former Xbox exclusive content to PC. Unfortunately, they screwed up nearly all of this. Thanks to the new textures, the game now requires 60 GB of storage space - that's 10 GB more than the 2015 Battlefront with all DLCs requires! Additionally, the new reflections look weirldy out of place in most locations.

Battlefront 2 now uses the menus of the console versions which look better, but also cut some of the more advanced functions of the original PC version. Multiplayer is straight up awful, even before you get to the gameplay part. The quick match functionality tries to connect you to password protected servers, meanwhile the server browser tended to not load at all for me most of the time.

There are bugs and issues no matter where you look - keep in mind I found everything I list here in less than an hour of playtime. Certain guns clip through the screen, cutscenes show heavy artifacting, even the movie clips that loop in the menu backgrounds are compressed to hell and back. Oh, and sometimes the game will just produce an ear shattering audio error sound - hope you're not playing with headphones!

I have seen this called a cashgrab and I disagree, because a cashgrab would actually make Aspyr money. I have refunded my copy, and I'm assuming others will do the same. As of right now, I see no point in playing this over the originals. Both are available on PC with functioning multiplayer support and tons of mods. In a year or so, this Collection might be patched to a point where it's worth buying, but considering the blatent lack of competence Aspyr has displayed time and time again, I wouldn't bet on it.