a primeira impressão do público geral desse jogo é sempre bem dividida, alguns fazem cara feia, outros amam, e eu me encontrava naqueles que fazia careta, por quê? Porque desconfio das sequências dos jogos que não "precisam" de uma.

generalizar é perigoso, existe mil motivos pra algo ter uma sequência e outros mil pra aquilo ser bom, mas assim como o cinema, videogame é uma arte com base em dinheiro, pessoas trabalham na criação de jogos e pessoas precisam comer. Sobretudo então um jogo precisa vender, e é isso que dawn parece ser essencialmente, o primeiro castle do recente portátil da nintendo, que apela bastante pra um público infantil tornando acessível para crianças, ou seja, um lançamento seguro.

vendo isso ficava meio pa, ainda mais que a continuação em questão era de aria of sorrow, mas contradizendo tudo oq pensava, dawn é muito bom, as almas são mais aproveitáveis, há sistemas novos, é graficamente mais bonito e tudo que um castle bom tem, tem aqui também (menos o castelo, e aquela bosta de canetinha pra matar o boss).

embora eu tenha dito que jogos precisam vender, penso que isso não é inteiramente ruim, a arte é viva o suficiente pra se adequar ao mundo de indústrias, e nesse caso ainda a cabeça pensante era o Koji, diretor mais que competente pra criar algo bom.

dawn parece não ser digno de seu antecessor, porém é sim incrível, com algumas ressalvas sobre a dificuldade chata e enredo bunda, e o fator apelativo dele ingressou muita gente a castlevania.

A fun side effect of writing about games, even on an amateur level, is that one ends up reflecting and researching on games a bit deeper and thus getting to know more about them than if they just hop from game to game. I originally planned to open this review by talking about the early days of the DS and PSP, how despite the DS being the best selling (and arguably best) portable in history, the two portables being presented in 2004 left audiences puzzled as to what Nintendo was thinking, and why anyone would want that quirky thing instead of the much slicker PSP. That's because I believed that to be the cause for Konami opting to play it safe and make the first DS Castlevania a sequel -- an assumption which proved incorrect.

No, Iga was pretty much sold on the DS from the start, and Aria of Sorrow's great sales on a Nintendo platform sealed the deal on the DS as the host for the next portable entry in the Castlevania series. As for why make a direct sequel, in particular, that is owed to Iga knowing that he and his team had accomplished something special with Aria, both in terms of storyline and gameplay. Iga truly loves the soul system from that game, and that would become even more evident years later, with Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night, but I digress.

As a direct sequel to Aria, Dawn of Sorrow might get criticised for being a rethreading of known ground, but the fact of the matter is, it's rethreading some damn solid ground. Most of what I mention in my Aria of Sorrow review applies to its sequel as well, from the robust gameplay systems to the beautiful sprite art. There are some areas in which Dawn attempts to stand out from its prequel, some of which are successful, some of which, not so much.

Immediately apparent from the cover of the game is that the art style for character art was changed, moving away from Ayami Kojima's (gorgeous) character portraits to... somewhat generic anime art. This change is said to be a result of demographics, with portable gamers being mainly children and, as such, it making sense to use character art that appealed more to that age group. Unfortunately, none of us happened to be in the room when that decision was taken to loudly point out that Aria was a success among that very demographic and that aging down the brand identity so suddenly might be a bad idea, so this is what we got stuck with.

It's not that the character art is terrible -- it reminds me of Rondo, which also used anime art and is still widely beloved by the fanbase -- but Dawn is trying to tell a story from a handicapped position and nailing the gothic horror vibes right from the cover would have helped its case by a lot. See, the position of a sequel to a work that was never written in a way to have one is a difficult one: the big twists have already happened and characters have experienced their respective growths, so what do we work with to make a new story?

(Incidentally, Dawn opens by spoiling the big twist in Aria, so absolutely play Aria first if you can.)

What immediately springs to mind are those Disney direct-to-VHS sequels that were mostly pretty forgettable, when not antithetical to the original work, as that's absolutely the vibe one gets when one mischievous gang of troublemakers shows up in the opening in Dawn to oppose Soma and his crew. The generic cartoon aesthetic makes for a poor first impression even though the storyline is actually quite competent and, for a game ostensibly marketed at children, it shows some rather dark imagery.

The idea is that, with Dracula being forever gone, a cult forms from people that desire a new Dark Lord, and a few of its head figures step forward as candidates to fill the power vacuula. They decide to have a go at Soma, attacking him and his girlfriend when the two are hanging out in town, and our boy doesn't take too kindly to that, setting out in pursuit of the group, pulling the whole crew from Aria in with him. What follows is a metroidvania romp just like Aria, which has Soma claiming monsters' souls as he brings down the Dark Lord wannabes.

Where Dawn successfully improves on Aria is in quality of life features as well as better tuning. On the former front, Soma can now use two different equipment sets that can be swapped at the press of the X button, a very welcome feature as it switching souls without entering the menu, thus letting the player adapt to each situation faster. The game also makes good use of the DS's top screen, displaying either the castle map or a screen with Soma's and enemy's stats. While having the map always visible is a godsend in this genre, having enemy info readily available is great when farming souls, as it does exactly the same thing the gadget from the Advance Collection does in Aria.

As for tuning, weapons have been rebalanced, emphasizing their variety. There's even a system through which, by imbuing weapons with certain souls, they can be upgraded, a nice addition that unfortunately ends up underutilized due to the rarity of some of the souls it requires. Having a use for excess souls, however, is a nice thought, and again I point to Bloodstained as the unofficial successor to Dawn, with Iga further refining this idea in that game.

Incidentally, while Aria already had souls that powered up with their count, Dawn brings this feature to the forefront explicitly calling it the Soul Level -- this is also a key feature in Bloodstained, where it exists for all souls-- uh, all shards. Souls have also been retooled in Dawn: while a lot of them are reskins from those from Aria, there are a handful of interesting new additions to the roster, and the player can expect to work with different toolsets than the ones the prequel gives. Of note is that late game souls are absolutely stacked, making them really gratifying to use.

And they have to be, because the best part of Dawn is its extremely challenging bosses. Aria's were great, but Dawn takes it to a new level: every boss is a unique enemy with a carefully crafted moveset, and their hits are extremely punishing. Even when spamming items, playing sloppily ultimately ends up in Soma getting overwhelmed, so instead, the player is expected to learn each tell and carefully avoid each attack. The magic seal mechanic is the cherry on top, forcing the player to remain vigilant for the prompt while adding flavor to finishing off the boss.

(Admittedly, if playing on an emulator, magic seals are an absolutely cursed mechanic, practically serving as an accidental form of anti-piracy . In that case, use the mod that removes them from the game.)

But is it better than Aria? Probably not: it will never be able to count on the simplicity and novelty factor that that game presented. However, even if it doesn't surpass its predecessor, it is a thoroughly enjoyable game that proudly stands at its prequel's side. Fans of Aria willing to look past a horrid first impression will find themselves a fiercely challenging game that brings back many of the original's boons.

I'm torn on this one, cause while I legitimately liked it at points there's so much here that prevents me from liking it as much as the previous games. Well I mean for starters I downloaded a patch to get rid of all the magic seal touchscreen bs, It did help out my experience more but even looking past that this one isn't as memorable as Aria of Sorrow in my honest opinion. I got lost way too frequently and the game isn't really good at telling you or pointing you in the right direction to go in all the time. The story is just ok, the gameplay is ok, it's just an ok game not much more I can add, if you're going to play this i'd highly recommend the patch for it since you can bypass all the annoying touch screen magic seal gimmicks easily that way.

It is without a doubt not as bad as people make it be, not even the rune system is as bad as they say, it made me lose like once or twice but pretty fair and not too annoying. The gameplay is good as always even better in some places the graphics are a pretty nice upgrade, specially those interactable environments like the cars at the starting area (that was legit incredible wish more games had it). But sadly the story and the portrait and visuals (cover, ui art etc) are quite a downgrade from the gba games, it literally threw away the castlevania legacy to become anime, and a bad one at that. The story is really bad with the shittiest villain so far and the most forced story in the post SOTN games. Somehow it had the worst final sequence of rooms followed by the coolest end of game final boss. Still overall a pretty good game sadly the story, artistic style and the more child friend nature brought it down a bit.

I am Soma. 100% map completion. 100% souls. 100% enemy drops. I didn't get max level like in Aria, but that shit would've taken way too long.

I've been very slowly chipping away at the 100% for this game, so I've been waiting a while to make this review.

I would like to start this review by apologizing to my good friend, Jack. Jack, I promised you that the next metroidvania I would play was Super Metroid. I have Super Metroid, I told you I'd do it, I said I wouldn't play another Castlevania game. That was a lie. A few days after finishing Aria, I was lying in bed and I made the decision to start up Dawn of Sorrow on my DS. Since then, I've 100% the game. For that, I sincerely apologize and hope you forgive me.

With that out of the way, honestly, Dawn is pretty good, but Aria is just better in my opinion.

I'll start with all the things I don't like because they definitely thought that they had to change the game since this is a direct sequel and damn, some of these changes are mad ass.

-The magic seal system sucks ass and so does the Balore effect (but that's only important for maybe, 3 rooms so it's not a big deal). The amount of times I fucked up drawing a seal and having to keep fighting a boss is too many to count and I hate having to put the DS down so I can draw some stupid lines on the touch screen. I hate when I have to physically let go of my controls so I can play some dumb ass mini game they put in that adds nothing to the experience. I don't care that the DS has a touch screen.
-Weapon Synthesis is stupid and takes away from the exploration part of the game. The map is really big and (for the most part) well designed. Why bother forcing the player to farm souls to craft stronger weapons (which you can't find in the map now because they're tied to crafting) when you could just take advantage of the map and make them things you find as rewards. The amount of souls I farmed just to craft some weapons which I never used because I would farm the next version immediately is too many to count.
-Just like in Aria, you get Hippogryph (super jump) and Black Panther (run really fast) late in the game. The difference is that in Aria you still have some time to mess around with them and have some fun moving around the map with those abilities before beating the game. In Dawn, you literally get Hippogrph halfway into The Abyss (same as Aria's Chaos map section) and Black Panther within THE LAST 10 ROOMS OF THE GAME. You have basically no time to mess around with these abilities before you reach the final boss, which is just mad stupid in my opinion. To go on a little bit of a tangent, one of the best parts of SotN is that you get a bunch of great and relevant movement options which when used together and practiced, you get an amazing movement system which feels satisfying. Also, you have every ability before the final sections of the game, then you have the entire inverted castle to mess around with them. In Aria, you get super jump and super speed kind of late, but it still works. In Dawn, you literally get them at the end of the game and it stinks.
-The final two sections of the map in Dawn are straight dog water butt cheeks. The Mine of Judgement and The Abyss are both horribly designed and there's nothing anyone can say to change my mind on that.
-Final point and kind of unimportant especially on my end for a metroidvania, but the story in this game is pretty bad. Not important, but it was bad enough that I took note of it and the writing isn't very good either. When I say that, I mean that its even worse than some of the cheesy stuff in things like SotN, which definitely isn't well written, but at least it's not offensive and has some charm.

Okay, with all that out of the way, I still did really enjoy the game and think its good. The combat is fun and has a bit of a learning curve from Aria, but nothing that ruins the game. The game is overall more much more difficult than Aria, which isn't necessarily a good or bad thing, but was noticeable. The souls were still fun to mess around with, but weapon synthesis kind of fucked it since I'd have to use souls for weapons and I was too lazy to farm multiple of a bunch of souls. The weapons are satisfying to use and the bosses are still (for the most part, fuck Rahab) well designed like in Aria (nothing as good as Julius or Chaos though, but I also haven't done Julius mode yet so I haven't fought Somacula). Finally, the castle (not including The Mines and The Abyss) is well designed, but they put in a lot of the really tall and open rooms which just made me want super jump early and that sucks ass. Overall, good game, definitely has flaws, but still a solid time and I'm biased.

When Gamers Saw This Soma Cruz They Turned Pale And Called The Cops

4 Signs Telling That Draculas Are Living Inside Your Body!

'Pssst' Skeletons Hate When You Do This, But They Can't Stop You (It's Genius)

Malacoda Gives Birth to Barbariccia — When Doctor Sees It, He says "That's Not A Barbariccia"


sponsored

Aria of Sorrow kinda has the novelty of doing all of these concepts and ideas first but DoS is still a worthy sequel. Still love how batshit insane the abilities in these games are, Soma Cruz is so cracked.

Recently played through the GBA trilogy so it was refreshing playing one of these games on a more powerful console. Some cool set pieces here that would have been hard to pull off on the GBA. Sprite-work is also, thanks to the ds, on par with SOTN which says a lot

The new artstyle is sadly very sauceless with almost soyjak-esque character portraits. Ayami Kojima, we miss you 💔