Snappington1
2020
so funny if your friends are actually funny and not mcu liberals
2014
use firefox
2008
most overrated developer of all fucking time
collecting fan art in a folder is more engaging
2017
good but gartic phone outsold
2009
tbh only way to play this game and have fun is by not knowing what the objective is. my first few matches (this was many years ago) i played Amumu bc he looked funny, and i just piled on HP items until his health bar was basically just black lines visualizing HP segments. i would literally just run around and find enemy players, then headbutt htem until they died hahaha
then i learned what the objective was. Big Mistake....
Over time, I've drawn a line between art and content. I try not to gatekeep art, but while content may fit the technical definition of art, I find it increasingly difficult to call it that. While most (not all) games released are made partly for commercial reasons, I think it's important to acknowledge the balancing act between the commercial and the artistic.
Many games compromise a lot for the sake of sales, and some do not. Dwarf Fortress before the Steam release was the epitome of this. It was a free game with a donation system, so you could send the developer money if you liked the game. In addition, Dwarf Fortress was inaccessible to say the least. Out of all the critical darlings in the gaming space, it was (and arguably still is) the most difficult to get into. But that's what makes it unique, it's what gives the game its charm. Uncompromising in the extreme, and doing something that no other game has replicated to this day.
League is not one of those games. There is an argument to be made that the game may have started like that, and sure, the game is free, but make no mistake. The model is not the same as that of Dwarf Fortress in both philosophy and practice. The fact is, free to play makes more money than pay to play in the gaming market ever since at least the early 2010's. No, whereas a Dwarf Fortress player might drop the game due to its notoriously difficult but rewarding systems and controls, a League player will continue to play League despite hating every moment of it. This is due to the psychology of content games versus art games. If you become addicted to an art game, that's generally because you love the game and cherish it for what it does. If you get addicted to a content game like league, it's because these companies literally hire psychologists to design dark patterns into the core of their games. They are not the same.
I want to end this review with a message to the reader. Stop playing content games. Your life, physical and mental state, and general wellbeing will improve. Replace content games with art games, games that were made with passion. If you play League, you are falling into the same trap that has ensnared millions of people. The game is not free to play, the cost is in years of your lifespan, and I do not mean that lightly.
then i learned what the objective was. Big Mistake....
Over time, I've drawn a line between art and content. I try not to gatekeep art, but while content may fit the technical definition of art, I find it increasingly difficult to call it that. While most (not all) games released are made partly for commercial reasons, I think it's important to acknowledge the balancing act between the commercial and the artistic.
Many games compromise a lot for the sake of sales, and some do not. Dwarf Fortress before the Steam release was the epitome of this. It was a free game with a donation system, so you could send the developer money if you liked the game. In addition, Dwarf Fortress was inaccessible to say the least. Out of all the critical darlings in the gaming space, it was (and arguably still is) the most difficult to get into. But that's what makes it unique, it's what gives the game its charm. Uncompromising in the extreme, and doing something that no other game has replicated to this day.
League is not one of those games. There is an argument to be made that the game may have started like that, and sure, the game is free, but make no mistake. The model is not the same as that of Dwarf Fortress in both philosophy and practice. The fact is, free to play makes more money than pay to play in the gaming market ever since at least the early 2010's. No, whereas a Dwarf Fortress player might drop the game due to its notoriously difficult but rewarding systems and controls, a League player will continue to play League despite hating every moment of it. This is due to the psychology of content games versus art games. If you become addicted to an art game, that's generally because you love the game and cherish it for what it does. If you get addicted to a content game like league, it's because these companies literally hire psychologists to design dark patterns into the core of their games. They are not the same.
I want to end this review with a message to the reader. Stop playing content games. Your life, physical and mental state, and general wellbeing will improve. Replace content games with art games, games that were made with passion. If you play League, you are falling into the same trap that has ensnared millions of people. The game is not free to play, the cost is in years of your lifespan, and I do not mean that lightly.
they should make a new genre called piece of shit
1999
Probably the best looking 3D game of the 90's. I'm still not sure how they got it to look this good, most non-2D games from this decade look fucking awful. seriously, there are plenty of games from the past 10-20 years that look way worse than this.
as for the gameplay, i think it's pretty damn smooth. i always felt like Dead or Alive got this unfair rep for having big boobies when in reality they're actually quite fun fighting games. up there with Tekken for me at minimum
as for the gameplay, i think it's pretty damn smooth. i always felt like Dead or Alive got this unfair rep for having big boobies when in reality they're actually quite fun fighting games. up there with Tekken for me at minimum
2020
hello everyone
Who owns fall guys on the ps4
would any of you like to attempt to unlock the “infallible” trophy, that requires a group of four to unlock it. We’re at 3/4 and we need one more to join our group so we can try to unlock it
Who owns fall guys on the ps4
would any of you like to attempt to unlock the “infallible” trophy, that requires a group of four to unlock it. We’re at 3/4 and we need one more to join our group so we can try to unlock it
2006
basically unlimited content. kinda like minecraft in that sense but a lot less reliant on mods and has actual emergent gameplay
1996
my friend twist wont yop on neo turf masters bc he's a little bitch that mains ken
2019
Some might go full reddit mode and get mad at the gacha mechanics but this game is how all online matchmaking games should work.
- There is no chat, only emotes.
- You choose the lobbies based on your skill level/comfort.
- Cool graphics, but not overbearing.
- Decent amount of in-game references.
- Akagi
The only issue with this is some of my friends refuse to play it bc it makes their fans spin.
- There is no chat, only emotes.
- You choose the lobbies based on your skill level/comfort.
- Cool graphics, but not overbearing.
- Decent amount of in-game references.
- Akagi
The only issue with this is some of my friends refuse to play it bc it makes their fans spin.
2019
the Dwarf Fortress of porn
2011
i made a character named Big Mac that was as big as u could make him and knocked out mike tyson in like 11 seconds
2013
probably the best clicker game, better if u set your fightstick to click when you move the joystick in any direction