229 reviews liked by ZestyJalapeno


It's good, and you definitely should play it if you like Half Life, but it's no replacement for Half Life. It's gunplay, enemy design (aka reskinned Combine that are more aggressive), aesthetics/atmosphere just aren't as good as the original imo.

Also say whatever you will about og Xen at least it didn't drag on for like 4 hours

ENG: The story is total nonsense, the music is too loud and there's no way to turn it down, and the level design is horrendous. It lasts 20 minutes and some people criticize it for that. But if I think this mod sucks it's not because of its length. I mean, there are good short Half-Life mods like Anti-Climax, but Before? It's without a doubt the sample of how things shouldn't be done. Amateurism at its finest.

ESP: La historia es un sinsentido total, la música está altísima y no hay forma de bajarla y el diseño de niveles es horrendo. Dura 20 minutos y algunos lo critican por eso. Pero si yo pienso que este mod es un asco no es por su duración. Es decir, hay mods buenos cortos de Half-Life como Anti-Climax. ¿Pero Before? Es sin duda la muestra de como no hay que hacer las cosas. Amateurismo en su máxima expresión.

ENG: Well this is going to be a quick review so listen up: the new weapons and enemies are GOOD, the now considerably larger levels are PASSABLE, and yes, if it weren't for the "Hell on Earth" subtitle absolutely no one would know that this DOOM takes place on earth.

ESP: Bueno esta va a ser una review rapida así que escuchen: las nuevas armas y enemigos están BIEN, los niveles, ahora considerablemente más grandes están PASABLES, y sí, sino fuera por el subtítulo "Hell on Earth" absolutamente nadie se enteraría que este DOOM tiene lugar en la tierra.

ENG: Good job, Gordon. Throwing that switch and all? I can see your MIT education really pays for itself.

ESP: Buen trabajo, Gordon. Le has dado al interruptor. Veo que tus años en MIT han valido la pena.

ENG: This game is like Tetris, sooner or later it was going to be made. It took a long time.

ESP: Este juego es como el Tetris, tarde o temprano iba a hacerse. Bastante ha tardado.

ENG: The year is 1996. At id Software they were already thinking of Doom as part of the past. The advent of Quake was imminent, which would have as its main feature the use of real 3D, unlike what was previously shown in Doom which used two-dimensional sprites for certain objects and monsters, among other gimmicks.

Quake sold very well. It was a success without a doubt and its legacy is undeniable. However, for many people, the great FPS of 1996 is nothing more than.... A shooter more like Doom than Quake? Did people not see the future and preferred to stick with what they already knew?

Let me explain. While it is true that Quake revolutionized the genre with its advanced technology for the time, the reality is that for many people the final taste was bittersweet. The terrifying Lovecraftian aesthetics, the music made by Trent Reznor himself that accompanied that feeling, and the predominant use of brown and gray colors, were not to everyone's liking.

Duke Nukem 3D, released a few months earlier by 3D Realms, was nothing of the sort.

With the engine created by Ken Silverman, Build Engine, Duke Nukem 3D was not just another Doom clone. It was the next step. Our protagonist, Duke, was a 100% stereotype of the Hollywood action movies of the 80s. And now we had a character that spoke and reacted to the environment, an environment that now provided believable places with details that the id Tech engine would only dare to dream of. In short, this game stood out for its interactivity with the world around it. It was a game that felt alive. And that was something that neither Doom nor Quake were.

With all that said, it seems that I hate Doom and Quake and Duke Nukem 3D seems to me the Holy Grail of Video Games. Nothing could be further from the truth, id Software games have their own merits that I already mentioned in my reviews of them, and Duke Nukem 3D is not perfect, as much as I would like it to be. The second episode has no place on earth, something that made this game special and by the end it's wearing a bit thin at best.

Despite that, Hail to the King, baby!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHnPUgHaltw&ab_channel=RedDragonPalace

ESP: El año es 1996. En id Software pensaban ya en Doom como parte del pasado. El advenimiento de Quake era inminente, este tendría como característica principal el uso de 3D real, a diferencia de lo mostrado anteriormente en Doom el cual usaba sprites bidimensionales para ciertos objetos y monstruos, entre otras artimañas.

Quake vendió muy bien. Fue un éxito sin duda alguna y su legado es innegable. Sin embargo, para mucha gente, el gran FPS de 1996 no es más que... ¿Duke Nukem 3D? ¿Un shooter más parecido a Doom que a Quake? ¿Acaso la gente no veía el futuro y prefería quedarse con lo ya conocido?

Déjenme explicarles. Si bien es verdad que Quake revolucionó el género con su avanzada tecnología para la época, la realidad es que para mucha gente el sabor final fue agridulce. La estética lovecraftiana tan terrorífica, la música hecha por el mismísimo Trent Reznor que acompañaba esa sensación, y el predominante uso de los colores marrones y grises, no fueron del gusto de todos.

Duke Nukem 3D, lanzado unos pocos meses antes por 3D Realms, no era nada de eso.

Con el motor creado por Ken Silverman, Build Engine, Duke Nukem 3D no era un clon más del Doom. Era el siguiente paso. Nuestro protagonista, Duke, era un estereotipo al 100% de las películas de acción hollywoodenses de los 80s. Y es que ahora teníamos a un personaje que hablaba y reaccionaba al entorno, entorno que ahora propiciaba lugares creíbles con detalles que el motor id Tech solo se atrevería soñar. En definitiva, este juego se destacaba por su interactividad para con el mundo que lo rodeaba. Era un juego que se sentía vivo. Y eso era algo que no eran ni Doom ni Quake.

Con todo lo dicho, parece que detesto a Doom y a Quake y Duke Nukem 3D me parece el Santo Grial de los Videojuegos. Nada más lejos de la realidad, los juegos de id Software tienen sus propios méritos que ya mencioné en mis reseñas de los mismos, y Duke Nukem 3D no es perfecto, por mucho que me gustaría que lo fuera. El segundo episodio no tiene lugar en la tierra, cosa que hacía especial a este juego y al final se va desgastando un poco a lo mejor.

Pero que mierda digo, yo voy a seguir con Duke, caretas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHnPUgHaltw&ab_channel=RedDragonPalace

A decent game from a studio that has put out stinker after stinker. Even so, with this probably being the game of theirs that has the best moments in it, it also has some of the worst. Of course the themes of the game are handled badly! David Cage is barely even human. He doesn't understand what makes a good story good. And of course Kara's entire plot is just an excuse to have his favorite "pretty woman in peril" trope. I've seen it all before.

What I did not expect was the genuinely awesome buddy cop between Android and Human. Connor and Hank are great, and their scenes together feel the most believable and human of any of them. And from what I understand, that is almost all attributed to Clancy Brown and Bryan Dechart's improvisation during filming these scenes. And apparently they had to fight tooth and nail to keep those little moments in the game because of David Cage who did not understand why they would do such improvisation. Ridiculous french man tries to self sabotage his own game.

It's one of those games that you play it, you have a good time, and then the next day you start to think about it and it all falls apart. If the game was all Connor and Hank? Possible 10/10. But with the Madison Paige 2.0 bot having one of the worst story moments I've ever seen, and Jesus bot Marcus as the leader of the robot civil rights movement, Detroit disappears SO FAR up David Cage's ass and miles away from anything that was initially likeable about it.

That Star Wars game is gonna SUUUUUUUCK.

Sigil

2019

I had a really good time running through Sigil. These are the style of Doom levels I like with an emphasis on environmental puzzle solving and navigation, rather than strictly monster closets and ambushes.

Romero's brand of Doom feels less cheap and more interesting than levels designed by the other members of the original team and that personality comes through here.
This expansion focuses on switches you have to shoot to change the level, which works really well! There is engaging gameplay in searching for the switch you need to progress as well as in preparing yourself and a plan of escape for the level change and possible assault you will face when you shoot it. I am definitely not good enough at Doom to just blast through these in one try, but the trial and error and learning of the level was satisfying for my play style (failure and save-scumming).
Some things Romero loves to put in don't work quite so well for me. These levels have quite a few narrow walkways and ledges to navigate, which doesn't really feel hard or satisfying, just tedious.

Playing Doom is, of course, kinetic and even with the lack of a wider monster roster in this original game, feels great. The relatively low number of enemies lets the game focus on putting you in interesting situations and having interesting level exploration. Romero is obviously more interested in the level design levers he can pull here -- he only uses a couple of Cyberdemons and Spiderdemons in the whole set. It isn't about killing more and bigger demons, it is about finding your way through these spaces and exploring them completely. Approaching Doom level design in this way lets these levels feel unique and meaningful in a way that I find many levels in even Doom II don't achieve.

If you like Doom, Sigil is a cool set of expansion levels made by the man himself. Play it!

AD is a testament to the skill and passion of the quake mapping community (❤️) but it's also a monument to excess.
2+ hours , 250+ enemies, and 25+ secrets per level is just too much. no map concept can survive that kind of overexposure.
for my money (lol) something like the snack pack or the 100 brush maps are better examples of quake level design: short and sweet and not as concerned with spectacle or polish.
AD is super worth playing, if for no other reason than because it's an important cultural object, but i do not enjoy it.

I’m only beginning with this exploration of fan-made Doom wads, and i finally sat down with the widely acclaimed Alien Vendetta, considered by many as “the most influential wad ever”

The first 10 levels were a very exciting experience, and i guess those are the only maps of this wad i see myself replaying in the future. As for the rest of the wad, i have to say i felt disapointed, and even completely unpleased at times.

I don’t have enough background to understand properly in which manner this wad has been so influential for the Doom community. All i can see is that this Wad had a thing for extreme difficulty, which could go in two directions:

1. Difficulty in terms of exploration, which means that certain maps are just so complex they’ll keep you going round and round trying to find the missing switch or key, ending up being a pretty dull, tedious and frustrating. The typical examples are Map 11, and Map 20, the famous egyptian-themed “Misri Halek”. Both of them took me a bit more than an hour each to finish. In the case of Map 11, i think that difficulty is mostly due to a really bad design, but in the case of Misri Halek, it’s definitely a desired effect, since no human on earth can ever dare say that Misri Halek is a badly designed map. It’s just that it’s artistic ambition ends up going against gameplay. And i wanted to play Doom, not f***ing Hexen.

2. Difficulty in terms of combat, which is pretty well represented by this wad’s obsession in throwing in some slaughtery moments in probably most of it’s maps. This is not really a problem by itself, since a very specific slaughtery moment at a certain point of a map could be a very exciting challenge, one that enhaces the overall quality of the map. The real problem here is the actual slaughter maps, from Map25 onwards. And also Map32, which is also a slaughter map but since it was the first one that i played, i had enough patience to deal with it. From Map 25 onwards i just lost my will, and i just turned on the cheats in order to get through the next level, just to find out that it was another slaughter map. I just don’t understand that style of maps, and what’s so fun about them. Pretty sure it wasn’t the first one, but i’ve read somewhere that AV is actually the one that popularised slaughter maps. If so, i guess that part of AV’s influence isn’t really a positive thing. Anyway, my information could be completely wrong, and of course my dislike for slaughter maps is just me.

In conclusion, the first third of the WAD is definitely the most fun and consistent. Second third starts to get a bit tiring, despite some memorable moments like map 20 (which still has a pretty questionable gameplay). The final third is also a combination of forgettable maps, with the infamous slaughter maps which are absolute garbage if you ask me.

Favourite maps: 04. Seclusion/ 08. Beast Island/ 09. Castle Gardens/ 10. Toxic Touch /23. Blood Sacrifice/ 31. Killer Colours

Worst maps: 11. Nemesis/ 25. Demonic Hordes/ 26. Dark Dome / 27. Stench Of Evil / 29. Fire Walk With Me / 30. Point Dreadful

And of course Misri Halek deserves a honorable mention, probably one of the most memorable maps ever done.