This one feels much, much more polished than We Were Here or We Were Here Too. There's much more varied environments, there's a plot, there's cutscenes, and the puzzle are so much more varied and better thought out than in the previous titles. Bring a pen, because boy do they get complex...

If I was to pick holes though, I would start with that story and the set dressing in general. I'm not really sure what starting the game at the research base adds; I felt much happier once we inevitably got back inside the castle, an environment much more fitting for this kind of game imo. The story.... ehhhh, I'm sure somebody likes it, but it didn't do it for me at all. I don't think it needed to be there at all (the first two games lacked any kind of plot and were no worse for it), and it feels like only one of the 2 players gets given enough information to have any clue what's happening. The other gets to watch hackneyed characters just spout overly flowery dialogue at each other and I'm just not here for it.

Overall though, definitely the best of the 3 I've played by this point. It's nice to have a series with a consistent upwards trajectory in terms of quality for once.

Whereas the first entry of this series felt much more like a prototype (or a really good student project), 'We were here together' feels like a fully fledged game now. You have to play this with a friend, as you are in different areas with complimenting information that each side needs to solve these puzzles. The main twist is, you don't see what the other sees and are reliant on a walkie talkie solely. So much like Escape Rooms IRL.
The game has basically 10 bigger puzzles that range from quite easy to frustrating, but not because they are too hard, but because the lack of info often times lets you follow wrong hunches for too long.
Still, it was a fun experience.

This is a decent co-op game, but it's plenty rough around the edges. The in-game radio provides a cool atmosphere at first but is ultimately clunky and irrelevant to the experience of the game. The puzzles that each player are given often feel asymmetrical in difficulty and in work given to each player, so often times one player might be left standing around while the other solves their puzzle. Aside from that and some oddball voice acting, the game has a neat story and some fun puzzles to play with a friend.

Es ist an sich lobenswert, dass das Spiel versucht sein Format etwas zu ändern. Man ist in der ersten Hälfte zusammen und muss gemeinsam Rätsel lösen, was zum Teil auch gelungen ist ... wären da nicht diese zwei unglaublich frustrierenden Schalter-/Aufzugrätsel direkt hintereinander. Nach der Hälfte wird das Spiel deutlich besser, besinnt sich auf alte Stärken und trennt die Co-Op-Spieler wieder voneinander. Ab diesem Zeitpunkt werden die Rätsel dann auch wieder deutlich besser. Schön auch, dass das Spiel dieses Mal gefühlt doppelt so lange ist wie die vorherigen ist und dies nie wirklich negativ ins Gewicht fällt. Bin auf den Nachfolger gespannt ... der müsste dann nur langsam mal im PSN erschienen.

Having played the first two games, I can say that this has been the best one so far. I had a lot of fun with this game, but there are some puzzles that never really made sense. There was this one clock puzzle that we ended up figuring out by pure luck. Overall though, this game had a story unlike the first two and it was kind of interesting. Both sides got to see different parts of the story, which could be annoying but I liked the idea that we could tell or not tell each other what's truly going on for our side.

Overall though, I think this game is worth getting if you enjoy puzzle games and have the right friend to play it with!