TylKos
1997
I understand why this is a landmark game and all, I really do. The story is good, too, especially for a video game. But the reason I don't like this game so much is because I really do not like turn-based combat. There are exceptions to turn-based combat, like Pokemon, but I don't think I can ever give a game with these mechanics a 5/5.
2008
Awesome game. Not as hard or as scary as people made it out to be, but I had a great time playing it. Once you see one jump scare, though, you've seen them all, and you can easily predict when future ones are coming. Also, gameplay is still really good, even after all these years.
Honestly, this is one of the worst games Bethesda has ever released and no one will say anything about it. It has game and immersion breaking moments all of the time, the "Bethesda Treatment," and while that's an issue in other games, it isn't in this game because "it is so big." It really isn't that big, even for the time it came out, and it is an unfinished game. Even in later rereleases, it is an unfinished game. I also find the characters in this game less memorable and less fun then in other games. I also don't like how the combat system is the same as it was in Oblivion. It was fine when that game came out, but to not make any improvements at all? It wasn't like the gameplay in Oblivion was groundbreaking at all. I genuinely do not see what is so amazing about this game.
It's freaking Dishonored. It is still a great game to this day, and I highly recommend a lot of people play it at least once to see what the hype around it was when it first came out.
Metroid games are broken up into two groups: the good ones are 5/5, and the bad ones are 2/5. This is one of the good ones.
2011
I don't think it accomplished much of what the first game did right, but it is better than the previous game. I liked the things they brought back from the first game, and I liked how there is a cool multiplayer aspect to it. However, my biggest complaint and criticism of this game is how much they strayed from what made the first game so good. I feel like I'm playing a slightly more spooky Call of Duty most of the time, and that isn't what I'm playing the F.E.A.R. series for. The gameplay is good, but it feels soulless and uninspired, which becomes a detriment to me and how I look back on it.
I think this is an underrated RTS game. But, the biggest issue I have with the game is that it just doesn't do anything that is without a doubt good except the aesthetic and character designs. In fact, I would say the problems with this game in general is what wasn't done honestly.
Pokemon Black 2 (like White 2) is the only time in the entire franchise they made a sequel to a mainline game, and I would argue this is the best Pokemon has ever had to offer.
Metroid games are broken up into two groups: the good ones are 5/5, and the bad ones are 2/5. This is one of the good ones.
The weakest of the Prime series, it still is a 5/5 because it just knows what the player wants all of the time.
The weakest of the Prime series, it still is a 5/5 because it just knows what the player wants all of the time.
Metroid games are broken up into two groups: the good ones are 5/5, and the bad ones are 2/5. This is one of the good ones.
Every single Smash game is like a 4/5 except for Brawl, which is a 3.5/5. These are the rules, I just follow them.
2002
Metroid games are broken up into two groups: the good ones are 5/5, and the bad ones are 2/5. This is one of the good ones.
This game is so fun with the freedom of combat to the point I have little complaints outside of it just doesn't have the feel or excitement as some of the other games in the series.
It is a fun game, for sure, but I also can't say I love this game.
2012
It is a fun game, but I think I saw someone say it is more show over substance, and that's true. I would say that while this game is not as Resident Evil as other games, it still has a lot of fun gameplay moments and I don't think I regret playing this game.