This is basically a "parenting fail" compilations

This game is a work of art, plain and simple. The atmosphere created is completely in symbiosis with the materials of its time. The vibrant and peculiar 3D of the PS1, its inability to render depth of field, the audio limitations that slow down the dialogues (it feels like being in a Rohmer film): remove one of these elements and the house of cards collapses. Remastering this title is impossible.

The game is TRULY frightening on many levels. To highlight just one element: the radio alarm. You always know there's an enemy nearby, but where? No jump scares: the game doesn't aim to scare us, but rather to terrorize us. I finished the game in 3 sessions and sometimes I was relieved to turn off the PlayStation because the atmosphere is so oppressive. My neck is still tense from this experience. Harry is never in a safe space; the player is always in danger.

The sound atmosphere and music, like any good horror film, are the scoliotic backbone of this hell. Between haunting drones and dark industrial sounds, the hearing is put to the test. Let it be known, I don't think I'll buy the vinyl to listen to it on a Sunday afternoon, unless I'm in need of an anxiety attack (aka never).

However, I must admit that I played it like a 'walking sim' by putting the game on 'easy' mode. The gameplay itself has aged relatively poorly, and the boss scenes are particularly bad. The interesting part lies in exploration and puzzle-solving. Its way of revealing the game's lore through objects and descriptions enhances immersion. I also have to admit that I am particularly a fan of the 'evolving' map system that prevents us from having to repeatedly open a locked door 15 times in a row. I look forward to playing the sequels

I have a lot of bias towards this game: I love it and I hate it. By the early 2000s, it was already established that the Zeldas were masterpieces, notably thanks to Ocarina of Time and Majora’s Mask. Not having a Nintendo 64, I didn’t have the chance to play them on their release day. The only Zelda I had played was Link’s Awakening on GameBoy Color in 1998, which I particularly loved. In 1999, I managed to find a copy of Link to the Past at a garage sale for a relatively high price (I believe it was 40€). Unfortunately, the game was in German, but I still tried to play it. I never managed to find the third medallion and remained stuck for a long time, excessively frustrated because I loved everything about the game. But the language barrier made the experience difficult. It was also impossible for me to use the manual (I only bought the cartridge), and I couldn't get my hands on a guide (this was in 1999, I remind you, I didn't have internet at home yet, and printed guides were unavailable at that time).

I think we forget that this kind of game can be particularly opaque and cryptic, even though LTTP is more accessible than the first installment of the saga. The impatient player then has two options to bypass the secrets of this game: the complete guide (and spoil the experience) or the hint for a boost. In this sense, the integration of the NPC who guides you for 30 rupees is a stroke of genius that I would have loved to discover as a child instead of raging on my own, cutting all the bushes in the game (I could have also learned German, what a noob)... Are there still players who will have a similar experience to mine nowadays? I posit here as a hypothesis that the lost player who does not have access to any form of "guidance" has practically disappeared.

Many critics rightly emphasized that LTTP has an absolutely gigantic semi-open world with the particular twist of the change thanks to the mirror. This part is especially remembered because it foreshadows the games to come. But when you really play this game, you forget that LTTP has a half of games close to the dungeon crawling genre, a genre immensely more popular at that time. Japan in particular was marked by the legacy of Wizardry. It's really fascinating to imagine that LTTP (and perhaps a major part of the Zelda series? I'm not an expert, so I'll remain cautious) was at the crossroads between open-world adventure and dungeon crawling. It raises the theoretical question: if the critics hadn't praised the open world of Zelda so much, would the series have become a series of dungeon games? In a parallel Bizarro world, would BOTW have looked like a Lunacid-type game and would Lunacid have been a game that pays homage to the open world? I'm totally digressing.

The game is truly a revolutionary masterpiece. The evolution between LTTP and The Legend of Zelda released 6 years earlier is staggering, even from a technical point of view. Although we live in completely different eras where graphics evolved extremely rapidly, it's amusing to think about this in perspective of a comparison between BOTW and TOTK, which also have almost 6 years apart and are, for all intents and purposes, identical.

Yet despite all the "objective" and qualitative data of this game, well ... I got a little bored in the middle of the game. The alternation between open-world and dungeons becomes a bit repetitive, but fortunately the end is amazing (since the ice dungeon, I would say).

A little annoyance on my part: trying to use online guides only as a last resort (for example, if I'm stuck for more than an hour), I managed relatively well until I got to Trinexx. Impossible for me to figure out how to defeat him on my own. Searching online, I discover that I need the "ice wand." I go to get it and I realize that I can never kill the dragon heads, even with 3 magic bars. I finally realize that my sword is only level 2. I realize that I completely missed the upgrades. Overall, it annoyed me because none of these items are necessary before. This kind of "dead end" is really annoying and discouraging. Without recourse to a guide, I would probably have given up at this point.

Another important point, in terms of narration, LTTP is in line with its predecessors: few dialogues, few memorable secondary characters. The game is more focused on its gameplay and level design while remaining relatively quiet. You either like it or you don't. Even though I struggle with games that are too talkative, I think I might have liked to be more involved in the world of Hyrule. LTTP remains very "gamey": I finished dungeon 5, let's go to dungeon 6. We generally don't care about the story, which is not a bad thing in itself. Add to that the fact that the game is generally very serious. It seems to me that the subsequent games often have more "dorky" moments.

Anyway, I'm glad to have turned this frustrating page of my existence.

Unless you're an aliasing fetishist or enjoy being humiliated by a blatantly unfair AI, there's no point in revisiting this first Mario Kart. Even though I have fond memories of it from my childhood, I must admit it hasn't aged well.

The game's difficulty is incredibly poorly balanced. The 50 and 100cc races are nearly impossible to lose because they're so simple. However, once you reach the special cup and the 150cc category, the game turns into SM domination and promptly punishes you for even the slightest micro-error. Honestly, 100% this game is truly one of the most punishing challenges I've ever subjected myself to :(

I must admit that I was completely reluctant to use the Wii Remote. I also confess that attaching a Wii sensor to a 42-inch LG OLED screen with tape (yes, screens are now too thin to simply place the sensor on the screen) in 2024 is a unique and anachronistic experience. After finishing the game, I find that the Wii Remote actually encourages multitasking: moving Mario with one hand and grabbing stars with the other. The experience is truly unique, and I wonder how this game will be preserved in the future outside of its original support. I imagine the Switch version uses the second stick to mimic the Wii Remote aiming. The experience must inevitably be frustrating and awkward.

Massive crush. I've rarely been so engrossed in a 3D platformer. After my unsuccessful attempts with Mario 64 and Mario Sunshine, I am completely convinced by the controls. Big shout out to the developers responsible for the camera movements. Such mastery is truly impressive, especially in a game that defies gravity so much. Even if it comes at the expense of open worlds (and thus a more linear game), I much prefer scripted and refined camera movements like those in Mario Galaxy. I never felt the need to reorient the camera.

I think everything has already been said about Galaxy. I remain overall speechless at the creativity of the levels; the game always seems to renew itself without ever falling into repetition. Just majestic.

If the game had a « skip the cutscene » feature, the game would be beatable in less than 20mn.

Joking aside, I almost feel empathy: they were trying so hard to do well, yet they failed in every direction.

Famous actors... but they're animated like lifeless puppets.

A complex narrative with various branches... but it hides an ultra-linear gameplay and a story full of constant flashbacks. It's also way too long.

Thrilling cutscenes ... but they're spoiled by the stiffness of the character animations. In comparison, Metal Gear Solid 1 managed to breathe life into a story with far fewer technical means.

Taking control of Jodie... but with tank-controls reminiscent of the worst PS1 titles.

Taking control of Aiden... but literally feeling nauseous because the camera is so sensitive. Moreover, there's no nuance in the interaction with this character: whether you snap someone's neck or press an elevator button, Aiden does it with the same intensity.

Dozens of characters ... who are all clichés of clichés.


I think in 20 years, we'll look back on this kind of game as the "golden age of video game B-movies."

STAY ALERT – STAY ALERT - STAY ALERT – STAY ALERT - STAY ALERT – STAY ALERT –
BOOM TSSSS - BOOM TSSSS - BOOM TSSSS - BOOM TSSSS - BOOM TSSSS - BOOM TSSSS -

When I was a teenager, I used to see this game on the shelves of game shops and think to myself, 'Who would want to play that? It looks like an old, ugly arcade game.' How foolish I was.

Rez has so much style. It's actually quite difficult to describe because it's both a geometric and rhythmic experience. This game encapsulates a certain idea of 2000s techno music. Musically, it falls between trance, synthetic acid house, and hard tech. It's important to note that the artists who created the music for this game (Ken Ishii and Joujouka, at least) are recognized electronic music producers who were important in the 1990s and still are today. One wonders if the game was created from the music or vice versa.

The level design remains a mystery to me: it feels like constantly diving into a neon fractal in a world that defies all physics. Level 4 is particularly epic. The game operates solely on its flow, linking a certain form of visual abstraction that perfectly syncs with the electronic music played as a mix, not track by track. The game can truly take you to an 'out-of-body' state that only a nightclub with lasers, strobe lights, and smoke machines can evoke.

You can still feel Sega's total mastery over the arcade game genre.

Warning : spoilers

What happens to Edith Finches = 2 hours of wow moments.

What makes a linear narrative game able to remain a game and not just a narrative movie? I believe this game brings interesting propositions.

These are essentially random thoughts.

- Great creativity in the interactions between the character, the environment, and the text.
- Breaking the laws of character movement.
- A whimsical architecture made up of accumulations of rooms and secret passages.
- Playing with a form of media history: glasses-photos, the unfolding book, comics, photography, the flip-book, etc.
- The swing scene: just incredible. It creates tension in a sequence that only aims to tell a short flashback. Much more interesting than a QTE sequence in most games of this style.
- A lot of humor too: references to Halloween the movie. Walter's radio music styles changing over the years. The "Pulp comic" moment as well.
- Relatively simple story: a girl seeking to understand the mysteries of her family. When you see the family tree, you might think it's heading towards something relatively boring, like reliving all the stories of the family. Yet, it's the game's mastery to make the visit to this family album interesting.
- The "Lewis moment" is a strong moment (if not the strongest) of the game. I don't think I've played many games where each hand controls a different part of the screen. You are truly immersed in Lewis's delirious thoughts. Anyone who has done a repetitive job can empathize with this character.
- Duration: 2 hours is more than enough.
- LEWIS SUCH a GAMER WITH HIS WASD KEYBOARD and double screens.

I played this game a lot as a child. I had access to it because it was on Super Mario Advance on the GBA. I found it particularly short, and I remember often challenging myself to finish it as quickly as possible. A good way to kill time on a long car journey.

I also remember that levels 4-1 and 6-1 (the one where a character on a cloud sent us spiked shells) were particularly fun and almost required us to speedrun.

Playing the game again, I found it to be a little "empty", and not really making the best use of the challenges it provides. The difficulty is poorly managed over the long term: it's either too simple or just irritating (hello hammer-throwing turtles, your patern is harder to read than Elden Ring's Malenia). The 7-4 and 8-4 puzzle-solving aspect is also annoying.

Although the graphics are very "early nes", I think Nintendo has done a particularly good job with its choice of colors: they're all warm and well-matched, and a real treat for the eyes.

In short, mythical but skipable.

2024 nonsense: I played it on switch with nintendo live and the game lags when there are more than 6 npc on the screen...

With a view to playing all the Zelda games, I unsurprisingly decided to start with the first one. Obviously, the game bears the marks of time, but I found it an exciting step back in time. Much of the Zelda grammar is already present: the heart system, progressive weapon and skill unlocks, shrines, etc...

This game also proves that an adventure needs (almost) no dialogue or cutscenes. It's possible to have an immersive experience through exploration and gameplay alone. It's also possible to guide the player through evasive NPCs without taking them by the hand.

Another interesting element that seems to differ in subsequent Zelda games is that the game is almost a survivalist game, given the hostility of the Hyrule universe. If I'm not mistaken, apart from the first panel and the "heart-restoring fairy", all the panels are death traps. Stand still and Link dies.

The game is also brutally difficult, requiring the player to use the full panoply of items to good effect. Two elements are particularly annoying in my opinion: 1) no "invisible frame" after being hit 2) after dying, no matter how many hearts you have, you go back to 3 hearts. The penalty for the last point seems very heavy to me, and it's not unusual for me to have to leave the sanctuary to go and fill up my pv at the fairy. This sometimes creates pacing problems, but also emphasizes that every damage counts and should be avoided. I really recommend doing all the upgrades you can before going to see Ganon.

I also find that the interface borders on a form of perfect minimalism. Everything is clear, immediate and useful. Right from the start, you can sense Zelda's intentions: to bring the RPG genre to a wider audience by simplifying some of its aspects (complicated UI, lots of text and sometimes very tactical combat) while retaining the desire to explore a wide world, to discover secrets on two levels: a rich open world and enigmatic dungeons. It's also a vision of the RPG that places the player as a constantly active actor (sorry for the redundancy): there are almost no pauses, almost no dialogue, no turn-based combat. In short, a clear break with the paper role-playing game. The granddaddy of console RPGs? shit, this game's almost 40 years old...

I believe I have rarely been so frustrated and annoyed by a game. Initial struggles with this inverted x-axis camera that cannot be changed. Just imagine for 30 seconds what this implies: my entire internal logic is disrupted. The same grievance I felt with Mario 64: the fact that the camera is sometimes controlled by the player and sometimes by the AI makes the game exasperating, especially in a platformer that requires precision. Either have a fixed camera or give complete control to the player. This hybrid and bastardized system is truly frustrating.

Honestly, when I play Super Mario Sunshine, I question my legitimacy as a gamer. How is it that I am so bad at this game? Is it because I didn't grow up with these 3D games (I have more experience with 2D platformers, FPS, RTS, etc.)? I am unable to get past the halfway point of the game, and the "hidden stages" made me rage in a somewhat ridiculous manner. I think I'll abandon this game for a while and reflect on the meaning of life. Why do I persist to this extent? Super Mario Sunshine has put me in this strange trance. Perhaps it's due to this "Caribbean midi vibes" music. This very relaxing atmosphere is completely at odds with the difficulty of some missions. Like a feverish nap on a beach after a pina colada loaded with rum, this game makes me nauseous.

The "secret stages," in my opinion, are the most challenging but also the most interesting levels. A clear proof that the Mario experience is primarily an abstract experience of shapes and sounds, not an immersion in a pseudo-tangible world like Isle Delfino.

In short, I did not enjoy it, I am unable to finish it, and perhaps I will finish it one day (but I doubt it).