185 Reviews liked by MothLibrarian


Sigil

2019

I've played a decent number of Doom WADs in my time, and they almost all run into the same problem for me: excess. 32 levels, slaughter maps, maps with 500+ enemies. I personally find this style of WAD to be completely exhausting, and even though I've overall enjoyed some of them (others not so much) I still tend to walk away feeling like I would've preferred things scaled back a notch or two.

So then comes Sigil, designed by John Romero himself and only 8 levels long, which I can honestly say is the most refreshing bit of Doom I've played in quite some time. Instead of massive hordes Sigil relies on clever enemy placement, deliberate resource allocation, and unique level design to challenge the player in ways I personally find to be 10 times more engaging than most of what else I've played. Sigil is hard, don't get me wrong, but I never felt like it was being cheap or repetitive. I was actually a bit hesitant going into this since it's only Doom 1 monsters but Romero really knows how to do a lot with so little, I'd forgotten there was a time when Cacodemons could feel like a legitimate threat.

Of course I couldn't sing the praises of Sigil without mentioning the stunning visuals or rocking midis. I've heard great things about the Buckethead soundtrack and I'll definitely check it out sometime, but it's got some stiff competition. I guess if I had anything to complain about I'd say a couple of the levels were a bit too dark, but given the insane amount of visual options most source ports have today it's almost not worth mentioning.

Sigil was a blast from start to finish, and I think it's awesome to see Romero return to the game he helped create and show everyone he's still got it. Can't recommend it enough.

January 2022 I played Dark Souls 2 : Scholar of the first sin for the first time, it took a while to click but eventually I fell in love with it and the series as a whole.

April 2024 It is with a heavy heart that I must face facts : I cannot play these games anymore. A similar thing has happened to me before, in 2022 I had the same realization about the total war games, but I have since been able to replay them a few years later. So I'd like to say its not "goodbye souls" but "see you later souls". I've simply grown too used to them, as replayable as they are, there is just nothing to excite me anymore. I will note however, that demons' souls was the last holdout.

Admittedly, this is probably less due to Demons' Souls' qualities than it is to the fact that I have done fewer runs of it than DS1 and 2 which I have played to death, by virtue of having to get my ps3 out of storage to play it, but nevertheless I find myself thinking about IT in particular lately.

Spoilers for Demons Souls I guess

The last time I played it I felt like the protagonist of Shadows over Insmouth or even 1984 when the cosmic horror hit as I made my way through the swamp of sorrows and thought to myself "oh god, I'm actually enjoying this". Miyazaki's psy-op finally got to me, whichever pheromone infused miasma the swamps emanate has made it into my head. Are these thoughts my own anymore? Am I but a vessel for the sacrifice to the great god of toxic swamp water that From Software has built an altar to?

Before any of the Demon Souls superfans get too pleased with their new convert, I think my overall enjoyment of DeS has stayed about the same; case in point I think I fucking hate 1-3 and 1-4. I think DeS strengths lie in atmosphere, in novel challenge revolving around environmental traversal, elemental match-ups, slow, methodical exploration and puzzle bossfights. In terms of straight up combat gauntlets its been utterly left in the dust by later entries, and its my least favourite aspect of the game. My ass also got killed because I accidentally climbed over a railing my rubbing too close to it and jumped into a 3 enemy gank, which felt less like punishing poor awareness and more getting fucked by weird controls. How hard is it to add a button press for mantling over obstacles? Either way, FromSoft abandoned that shit almost inmediately so its nice to know they agree with me.

The Blue dragon fucking sucks. The red dragon as an obstacle in 1-1 and 1-2 works perfectly, thematically and mechanically it serves its role of pseudoboss/setpiece wonderfully. The blue dragon sucks, whether or not you get past his second phase seems more luck to me than anything else given the disconnect between the visual outline and hitbox of his fire breath (especially if you rescue the knight dude) and given he guards the false king, as a player you're going to be seeing him a lot, leaving you to either absolutely master his bullshit timing or do the slow, tedious process of killing him with arrows. I have only ever fought King Allant "honourably" like 2 times maybe, because by the time I get to 1-4 my enthusiasm for DeS has grown thin and the tedium of the dragon and runback occupy such a space in my mind, that I usually just pull out the thief ring + poison cloud cheese combo, and I admit that with 0 shame. Its unfortunate, because the first time I fought King Allant I was legitimately sweating by the end of it, it was an incredible rush of adrenaline, but that fucking dumbass dragon had to fuck it up.

That's kind of DeS' double edged sword. It fucks with you, and dares you to fuck with it back, which is great when you max out health regen items so you can tank the poison and absolutely breeze through the swamp, but less great when you realize the optimum interaction with the world tendency system is to act in such a way that you dont have to engage with it at all i.e kill yourself in the nexus and always go in soul form. I get the logic in body form having the supposed risk/reward of extra health vs the chance to make the entire area harder if you die with it, but the usual obtuseness added to the fact that 25% extra health isn't particularly helpful compared to potentially getting into black world tendency, there isn't much of a choice. The added mechanic of item drop rates going up with black world tendency is also kind of pointless because pure white levels with sub-optimally upgraded weapons are infinitely easier than pure black with maxed out weapons. There's just not much of a choice here. You could argue that maybe there wasnt intended to BE a choice, given that the NPC which explained this mechanic was removed during development, but even as an opaque mechanic it cannot help but incentivise not bothering with it at all. Especially given the focus on cooperation I think they had to have realized people would crack the code on it eventually.

The poise system is weird, in that its an example of a system that is both too punishing and way too forgiving for the player, which is weird. Compared to the later souls games (though admittedly DS1 maybe went a bit too far in making poise OP) it fucks with the usual dynamic of the combat wherein you commit to every attack, both yours and the enemies' being slow and interruptable leading to tense back and forths. In DeS though, there is no poise, just hyper armor given by attacks. This leads to some weirdness. Take the scale miners in world 2. They are extremely tough skinned mindless workers in the mines of boletaria, they are very resistant to slashing damage but vulnerable to magic and pierce (and maybe blunt I think). So you'd think then that they would be able to shrug off any attacks from you and attack uninterrupted. This isnt really the case though, because hyper armor only kicks in during certain frames of attacks, hence if they start their pickaxe attack they are absolutely impossible to interrupt by quick thinking, as the attack has basically 0 windup before it enters the hyper armor phase, but if you hit em before they attack you can absolutely stunlock em into oblivion. The same is true of the blue and red-eyed knights who are way easier than they were likely intended to be because they don't have poise. This is what I mean, its both too punishing (doesnt seem to follow the dynamic of the rest of the combat) and too easy to abuse. The red eye knights in 1-3 are absolute dickheads for this, their charging spear attack can get spammed ad infinitum, with basically 0 cooldown and grants hyper armor. Thankfully I have a bow, but the amount of enemies in 1-3 is one reason why I hate it so much.

But nowhere is this poise problem demonstrated more than with Garl Vinland. Poor garl, serving a corrupt demon without poise. For some reason, of the heavy weapons which get hyper armor in DeS, seemingly the ultra greatswords and his fuck off hammer were excluded, and even if it wasnt easy as hell to parry him / get his hammer to smack the wall harmlessly, his dumbass heavy armor grants him 0 resistance to being stunlocked into oblivion. Compare him to Havel, who can also be cheesed, but at least he shrugs off attacks with a toothpick and hits you with his fuck off hammer regardless.

All that said, I love worlds 2,3 and to a lesser extent 4 and 5. 1-1 and 1-2 are great. Atmosphere and visual design wise they are great treats. I read an article I'll link here which brought up an interesting point I've been thinking about lately, which speaks to DeS' longstanding cult status. In the article they compare the flamelurker design in DeS and its remake, and how the latter looks like "artstation fire demon", which is harsh but kind of true. Its what you make when a director asks you for a fire demon, and if there is something that defines DeS I think, its that it embodies the opposite, for good and for ill. The vanguard demon, the storm king, maiden astraea, phalanx even, these all subvert usual genre expectations and give something rather unique without feeling try-hard. Everything else about its design from its mechanics to the art all seem to follow the rule of not just doing the obvious, the easy, the straightforward.

Think about the tutorial, where after maybe defeating the vanguard demon (which again, is not the type of enemy one would usually put as a beginner boss, both in its lethality and slight goofiness of the design) you are taken to an area with some loot and then are put in front of a giant humanoid dragon, who kills you not by breathing fire and melting you (i.e what you would expect) but by hitting you with a big old punch.

So all my complaints aside, I have to respect Demons' Souls, and if I manage to get back into souls at some point in the future, I hope I get to enjoy being brainwashed into liking 5-2 again. And despising that fucking dragon asshole.

There's definitely a debate to be had on which version of Linda3 is better--the original PC Engine, or the remake on the Saturn and PS1. Of course the only place that debate happens is in my head, but hey...

The graphics here are obviously simpler (resembling a pico-8 game) and the game lacks a few QOL improvements and post-game extras, but as a complete, individual experience, this original might just win out. It's harder, for one, time passing more quickly and enemies both more aggressive and more likely to run, but also the cutscenes here are, I'd argue, better directed, their strange style and limited movement better representing the story than the remake's traditional anime scenes.

The ending was also changed for the remakes, which is a shame because what we get here is very possibly my favorite video game ending of all time. It's as beautiful as it gets here, and makes this version an easy recommendation on its own for me.

Either way you go though, Linda3 is an incredible experience. It is a completely unique, idiosyncratic RPG that very purposefully works against genre cliches of the time. It challenges the player both narratively and mechanically, and the game's open world monster hunting gameplay loop beat Pokemon to punch (and does it in an arguably more interesting way). The game is funny, scary, very very sad, and one of the most beautiful experiences the genre can offer if you are willing to give yourself up to it.

Does for Twin Peaks fans what Jaws did for sharks

That was fucking awesome. Excellent monster catcher. Of course it takes some aspects from Pokemon, namely the creature collection and evolution aspect, but the battle system and its volatility and difficulty feel MUCH more inspired by Megaten, which is even more evident when you realize the story takes many of its beats from games like Persona 3 (there’s literally a character who’s just like Koromaru here). It’s also very pleasing to look at, with a style of chibi sprites roaming around a 3d-rendered overworld, and obviously that’s pretty clearly reminiscient of the graphical style of Pokemon Gens 4 and 5. The open nature of the game scales very well too, and in many ways the map and its grid, and to a degree, the premise, remind me of old handheld Zelda games, particularly the ones on the GameBoy Color and Advance. If any two games inspired narrative aspects here, I feel like it’s a marriage of Link’s Awakening and Persona 3. Does that mean it’s anywhere near as melancholic or existential at times? No, but it has the capability to talk on that. Referring to this as a “Pokemon Clone” is a disservice. It’s a love letter to that series, but it’s also its own thing. As for negatives, the postgame quests are very grindy and repetitive, but the core game is so utterly addictive that it can offset this. Also the game can run a bit oddly. It’ll stutter in some cases to load in the environments. Nothing unplayable, but your immersion can and will be gutted at moments like that. Overall an amazing time.

I’ve always wanted to get into the series since I was younger, but never really found a good way to start until World caught my attention. After one hundred and thirty hours of playing through the game by myself and with an incredibly important friend of mine, my thoughts on the game are as vast and in-depth as the game itself. For this particular review, I’m actually going to be splitting it in half by reviewing both the base game, and its DLC: Iceborne since I find the two different enough to warrant discussions on, as well as my thoughts being long enough to also justify doing two reviews. This will be the first part of the review, Iceborne’s will be soon after. With that out of the way, let’s jump into the world of Monster Hunter.

Monster Hunter World creates a strong impression right away with the beautiful graphics, the presentation, and the first few cutscenes. While graphical fidelity isn’t necessarily Monster Hunter’s selling point, I must admit this game looked rather gorgeous, though the colors are a bit muted which seems to be a departure from other Monster Hunter games, but Rise seems to have gone back to the original artstyle. You create your character, you create your loyal Palico comrade, and are treated to some cutscenes. This is where we run into our first problem with this game, is the unskippable cutscenes. While I don’t skip cutscenes for my first playthrough, if I were to play Monster Hunter World again, I’d also have to sit through these cutscenes again as well, and they’re not necessarily short ones either. This normally wouldn’t be a big issue for me if the story was good, which we’ll get to, but the fact you cannot skip cutscenes is a minor blemish all things considered, but still odd.

The story of Monster Hunter World has some promise at the beginning, but never really does much with it really. A lot of the “story” is just to give you a reason to be fighting a specific monster, which works, but since these cutscenes are unskippable and typically uninteresting and long, they certainly don’t do much to hook or captivate the player as far as the plot goes. With that said, the cutscenes do a phenomenal job at introducing us to a new monster, as well as tease some of their capabilities when you actually fight them, which I really liked. Had Monster Hunter World focused entirely on the monsters themselves, and not the reason why you’re fighting them, I think it'd have benefited greatly from it, because any cutscene not involving a Monster introduction I found little to no reason to fully pay attention to since all it’s really doing is stringing things together for another encounter. I suppose that’s the point, but characters and dialogue in general are just bland to me, I’d rather just skip them to play the game instead. Except for the Huntsman, the Huntsman was alright.

Monster Hunter World’s gameplay is incredibly complicated with tons of moving parts, I find it both great and bad in a lot of cases, let’s get into it. I’m going to address my positives with the gameplay first, and then the negatives.

Monster Hunter World has a fantastic selection of weapons that each have their own playstyle, strengths, weaknesses, and builds with tons of customization and flexibility that allow you to tailor yourself for a specific monster, or to compensate for a weak aspect of your weapon or playstyle. I found myself very drawn to the Long Sword for its design alongside its good range, great damage, and decent mobility. It’s by all means a universally good weapon with very few drawbacks, however it’s a very difficult weapon to master. I also dabbled in Dual Blades, and the Greatsword, but ended up using Long Sword exclusively for my whole playthrough. While I can’t comment much on other weapons, they each have unique purposes and quirks that give them just as much reason to use than any other weapon, they all feel viable and useful. Dual Blades for example have a lot of hits and DPS, so it’s good for applying status ailments, Insect Glaive is great for mounting, Great Sword is great at shattering monster parts, and bow is a ranged weapon that can keep you out of harm’s way with plenty of options to deal good damage. Learning your weapon however can be quite the endeavor, as you’ll have to put in time to become efficient with them and understand their limitations. Since this was my first Monster Hunter, I ended up spending a lot of time in the training area for the first twenty hours or so just trying to understand my weapon and everything about it, which can definitely be a difficult hurdle to get across, but it’s worth it in the long run. Not every weapon is complicated, Dual Blades are incredibly simple, as well as the Sword and Shield, both are also very solid weapons that don’t fall behind the others, which is important to stress, simply pick the weapon you like the most.

Most weapons have sharpness you will have to manage while hunting monsters as well. Sharpness is incredibly important because the sharper your weapon is, the better damage it will do, and the less likely it’ll bounce off a monster's tough hide or skin. There’s many different “levels” of sharpness, purple being the best, and red being the worst. You’ll always need to check your sharpness meter often to make sure it’s not getting too dull, usually yellow sharpness is around the best time to find a moment to sharpen, though I personally always sharpened after a monster ran away to ensure maximum damage and wouldn’t need to worry about my weapon becoming dull in the middle of a scrap. I think the game does a great job overall giving you plenty of opportunities and big openings to sharpen your weapon, even during encounters, but sharpness is a very committal action that’ll get you punished since it can take awhile to do, but there are ways around this issue, such as special sharpening tools and a skill called “speed sharpening” which is pretty self-explanatory. I liked the sharpness mechanic quite a bit because by being diligent with it, you’re rewarded with more damage and less risk overall of being in a tight spot, of course if you really needed to sharpen in the middle of a fight, despite how long it is to do, you can always roll out of the animation, which is nice, there’s also some special sharpening tools that make it much faster as well.

Armor, charms, and decorations are essential building blocks to a hunter’s survivability, there’s a lot to it, but a lot of it is quite good. You’ll start off with some rather meek armor, but once you overcome your first monster, you’ll be ready to upgrade your gear if you so choose. This decision-making of which monster to hunt for their gear is the majority of your monster hunting experience, and there’s plenty of options. I think the idea of both grinding a monster for drops, while also being able to re-fight your personal favorites makes for a very strong gameplay loop that keeps you engaged for a very long time, I very much enjoyed grinding Rathalos and Odagaron for my high rank gear that lasted me until I got to the DLC. On the flipside however, fighting a monster for a specific piece of gear you don’t enjoy fighting, or simply never getting the drop you need can be very unengaging and bloat game time quite a bit, but generally I think it’s a positive since fighting the monster a lot will let you gain mastery over it, letting you shave seconds each and every time, which is its own reward to many. Of course, if you don’t care about this and just wish to progress, most monsters only need to be fought once to progress the actual game, there’s also other methods to get more drops from monsters if you need. Charms is another piece of equipment crafted from monster parts that allow you to gain a specific skill you might want, or your armor might not provide, from attack boost, to critical eye, you name it. I opted to go for the Health Charm since it increases survivability a lot, which you’ll need if you don’t have stellar armor, but you can make anything work really. Decorations allow you to slot in even more skills if your armor has decoration slots, your weapons can also have some. Decorations really allow you to be flexible with your builds outside your armor, which lets you slot in what you want to have, which I really like because there’s so many skills to choose from, plus it helps make experimenting a bit easier without crafting an entire new set of armor. Overall, building your character up, the armor, and the grind for the materials are all fantastic and kept me playing Monster Hunter far longer than I would’ve normally, but that’s by no means a negative, I very much enjoyed the progression, it felt rewarding, significant, and not too slow to where it dragged much.

Mantles are another idea in Monster Hunter I really enjoyed because it gave even more customization, but also allowed you to handle certain fights and situations much easier. Mantles come in many forms, from the vitality mantle that gives you more health, temporal mantle that gives you invincibility for several attacks until it wears off, elemental mantles that lower specific elemental damage, like fire, and the rocksteady mantle which prevents your attacks from being interrupted by attacks while still taking reduced damage. While they’re not essential for hunts, they allow a lot more room for error, or simply make it easier, especially if you’re struggling with a monster, crafting a mantle can mean the difference between a win and a loss. I personally opted to use the Vitality and Temporal Mantle, and I couldn’t tell you the amount of times it saved me in a pinch, it does take a second to actually put on the mantle, so keep that in mind. The drawback of mantles is they’re on a timer, once you put it on, the mantle will slowly lose its energy until it blacks out entirely visually, this is when you need to take off the mantle to let it recharge. I like this idea of having to be diligent with the mantle, but in a tough battle, it’ll be hard to find a moment to take it off sometimes, even though it only takes a second to do so, but make sure to get everything you can out of them, because once they run out, they’ll be out of commission for a decent length of time. If you’re not particularly interested in using a mantle, there’s also “boosters” which create an area of effect that can increase your weapon affinity, heal you and your allies, and remove status ailments, I never personally used these since I found mantles infinitely more useful and versatile, but also because boosters have to be placed and have a small area of effect which can be difficult to utilize in fights where the monster is constantly repositioning, or you the hunter have to reposition due to the monster’s attacks.

The slinger and environmental hazards are two components of Monster Hunter World I very much enjoyed overall. The slinger is this arm mounted crossbow every hunter worth their salt uses and will utilize on hunts. In order to use the slinger, you need ammo, which can be stones, to moss, to any number of things really which can then be used to trip environmental hazards, as well as against monsters. Against monsters, there’s a few specific things you can do with it, like getting their attention, but most importantly it can allow you to stun or stagger a monster. Specific ammo types will allow you to interrupt a monster’s attack, granting you a big opening at your discretion which is pretty much an essential mechanic in later fights, but can be neglected early on. Not all ammo can stagger unfortunately, which is a small negative I think makes sense in theory, but would allow all ammo to be invaluable instead of only a select few. The slinger also allows you to shoot special crafted ammo you make yourself, such as flash pods to stun the enemy for a long period of time, as well as forcing flying monsters to crash back down to the Earth, providing a gigantic opening and is almost essential for monsters like Rathalos, to the more obscure screamer pods that create a high-pitched noise that’s particularly useful against the likes of Diablos. Flash pods are more universally useful though, and in base Monster Hunter World, they’re a tad overtuned, making certain fights an absolute joke, so I opted to not abuse them much but is something to be aware of. I think the slinger’s most important use however is triggering environmental hazards. There’s a few cutscenes in-game that showcase this idea which I really like, though they still give you a tutorial on it which is understandable, though I’d much prefer to have put two and two together. Environmental hazards are usually unstable formations above monsters you can hit to make them come crashing down, like rocks in the ancient forest, to giant crystals in later areas. Though not every environmental trap needs the slinger to activate, some of them work if you can attract the monster to where they are like vine traps, which entangle the monster for several seconds, allowing you to get a lot of damage in! It’s up to you to take advantage of these environmental traps however, and they’re not guaranteed as you need to get the monster in position and either stun them or knock them down to do it, or get very lucky where they just don’t happen to move. If you do successfully hit a monster with one of these hazards, they will take a large amount of damage and automatically topple, giving you an opening on top of the high damage, which is incredibly beneficial and can make hunts go way faster if utilized well. Traps can also help you break monster parts which we’ll get into in a bit, but overall environmental traps can turn the tide or snowball your advantage momentously, and I quite loved the interactive environmental aspects a lot, there’s other things you can trigger as well like swarms of flashbugs to flash a monster, water geysers and lava geyser that deal passive damage as the monster stands in them, and environmental destruction from rampaging monsters among other things, such as Rathalos attacking the rocks in his nest to cause the water behind it to rush out, potentially flinging him off the cliff along with you if you’re not careful. It’s truly an interactive world, which I really appreciate as it helps the immersion aspect a lot, and again just very helpful to gain an advantage if you’re paying attention.

My absolute favorite aspect of Monster Hunter World are the monsters themselves. If you actually decide to not attack them and watch them from a safe distance, you can observe them, how they interact with the environment, other monsters, and themselves. For example, you can watch a Rathian hunt for food, you can watch Barroth try to cool itself off in the mud, and you can see even more intimidating monsters like Nergigante ( my personal favorite monster) groom himself and just walk around peacefully. These dynamics make these monsters feel real in an actual environment, not just boss fights that net you rewards. I think they absolutely nailed this aspect, since while even fighting monsters, they’ll often retreat to their nests to rest and restore their health, and if you take too long you’ll be at a further disadvantage. Turf Wars help emphasize these monsters are territorial not only to you, but other invading monsters, and will fend them off best they can. Mechanically speaking, Turf Wars always end in a tie as both monsters deal a massive amount of damage to each other alongside a unique animation. After this is over, the monsters can still fight each other with their normal attacks, which can drag on sometimes depending on the monsters, but you can sling a dung pod to drive off any monsters you don’t want to deal with. Usually the monster who invaded the territory of another monster will leave, feeling threatened, which thematically makes a lot of sense in some cases. In other cases, it makes less sense depending on the match-up, but I think the idea that every monster has a chance to beat another monster that is stronger than it is definitely possible. All of these monsters have specific routes, nests, and interactions that give them consistency to feel very real, and I absolutely love it. It was always a highlight to watch, and undoubtedly my favorite part of the game besides actually fighting the monsters.

Fighting monsters is one of the biggest selling points of Monster Hunter, so is it any good? Yes, very much so. When you’re fighting a monster, they have specific weak points you can take advantage of to deal higher damage than normal, and not every monster has the same weak points, which not only makes a lot of sense, but ensures not every fight feels the same. Some monsters might have weak arms, some might have soft tails etc. It’s up to you to figure out where the weak points are, though there are resources in-game to figure this out as well without guess-work, which I appreciate not having to look up a wiki to do so. There are some universal weaknesses though, monsters with large legs can be attacked to stagger them, if you damage their leg enough though, they might just topple over, completely at your mercy. This allows for a consistent strategy against monsters, especially new monsters you haven’t fought yet, but it’s not always guaranteed or ideal, since some monsters have very strong legs. One of my favorite parts of the combat though is part breaking. If you attack a specific part of the monster long enough, it’ll eventually break, which not only severely lowers their defense in that specific area, but it can also drastically weaken the monster. Let’s take Rathian as an example, Rathian has a tail flip attack that deals severe damage and can poison you, so this incentivizes you going for her tail, since if you cut her tail off, it’ll make her arguably strongest move much weaker. Not only does this give you a huge advantage to sever her tail, but it’s so satisfying watching the tail get cut off and go flying, you even get an extra carve from it, which basically means you get another drop from the monster, which can net you really valuable materials. Tail cutting isn’t the only part you can go for though, as monsters all have specific body parts they rely on for attacking that breaking will cause their moves to become far less dangerous, and in some cases, slow them down, or cause them to have much larger windows of opportunity to attack them. On top of all of these advantages, part breaking can topple the monster as well, which gives you even more opportunities to break parts which will eventually snowball you to breaking multiple parts in a row, which is so much fun to do and really rewards you as well. Each broken part will also give you an extra material after the hunt is over, further emphasizing part breaks, you can also destroy highly resistant parts of a monster to make them take solid damage in that area for the remainder of the battle. Part breaking is an essential component of hunts, and a very fun mechanic as well, once you figure out what part of their body the monster uses the most to attack with, or what its most dangerous attacks utilize, it becomes a glaring target for you to go for, which I love a lot, and was just another aspect of this game that made me put in so much time playing it.

As far as the monster’s attacks themselves, well it’s a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, there’s a lot of attacks in this game that feel well telegraphed and fair, allowing you to anticipate what the monster will do, and react accordingly by dodging or moving out of the way. On other occasions, some moves have some wild hitboxes that felt very deceptive in their size and range. One thing I need to stress about Monster Hunter World is how a monster’s attack pattern is entirely random. A monster may just use their worst attack three or four times in a row, and there’s not much you can do about that besides using slinger to stun them, avoiding it, or just getting hit. I think this randomness factor works since these are monsters, and just like animals, their behavior will be unpredictable, so thematically it all checks out, but mechanically it can feel utterly unfair at times. If a monster decides to just not give you many openings, or keeps moving around and you have to chase them down a lot, it can become rather annoying and hurt the pacing of the battle. Let’s not forget every hunt outside expeditions have a time limit, so the less time you’re attacking, the more that clock is ticking down. I will say in base game, the clock usually never played a factor in victory or success for me, but it’s definitely something that became an issue later on. I didn’t really notice these issues until the endgame, since most of Monster Hunter world is actually rather easy once you get the hang of it, but in the endgame it starts getting a little ridiculous. Some moves have barely any start-up at all, so reacting to them is a nightmare, insta-kill moves, ridiculously sized attacks etc. This definitely bogged my experience down somewhat, though it wasn’t super consistent enough for me to feel like it was a pressing issue a lot of the time, but it’s definitely there. Some monsters are better than others in this regard, though like any game, some monsters are incredibly well designed, some are incredibly poorly designed. Some of my least favorite monsters were definitely Black Diablos, Uragaan, and Kirin for reference. My favorite fights include Nergigante, Teostra, and Odagaron. My biggest issue with the combat really just boils down to some moves either being too strong, too fast, or just having weird hitboxes, everything else is either fine or manageable, especially in a multiplayer environment, I’d even argue some of these criticisms disappear if you’re playing with one other person like I was, but when playing by myself, these flaws became much more apparent.

Monster hunter world was one of the best multiplayer experiences I’ve ever had. Even though I only played with one other person, being able to share this experience with them and fighting giant monsters together was always fun. Even in the more difficult fights, having someone to rely on is comforting, but always keeps the fight engaging since teamwork becomes essential in multiplayer. Monster’s gain much more HP the more people are in a hunt, so everyone needs to usually pull their weight for a hunt to be a success. Having an ally to split aggro can help ease pressure and give you a moment to heal or buff up if you need, but makes the monster a bit more chaotic to predict, which I honestly preferred, made things more interesting, plus the trade-off of being able to take a breather was very welcome. Allies can hit you out of stun and other nasty aliments as well, heavily rewarding teamwork as you’ll both be keeping an eye on each other if you’re ever in a bind, which is pretty much essential in the endgame. There’s plenty of multiplayer support skills like wide range that allow you to support your team further by allowing you to heal some of your allies’ hp by drinking a potion which also heals you, as well as buffing items like might and adamant seeds. Of course, multiplayer has drawbacks as well, hitting your allies with your weapon will flinch them, interrupting their action for a second, in which case they’ll need to do it again, though the flinch animation actually has some i-frames on it, so it can have incredibly niche use in that regard. You can run flinch free to prevent this, and if you’re with a LongSword player like myself, I’d recommend it, ‘cause LongSword is very well-known for flinching allies, which can be frustrating for sure. I have to admit though, I vastly preferred my Multiplayer experience compared to my Single Player experience, which we’ll get into, but I was thoroughly impressed with how thoughtful and fun the Multiplayer was speaking strictly mechanically, because Multiplayer has its own specific issues we’ll also get into in a bit. Overall though, a must-play with friends if you can get them together for it, because it’s incredibly fun. I'd argue half of my enjoyment was just from reacting and making callouts in call to my teammate. Truly a one-of-a-kind experience.

For singleplayer, you have your trusty Palico friend to help you against monsters. The Palico, much like another hunter, can split aggro for you, heal you, and help deal damage to the monster. I very much liked the Palico not only for this, but because they’re just a very loyal and charming companion that has a lot of cute dialogue and interactions with your hunter. They really made it feel like you were a team with quite a bit of history before the game began. You can also craft gear and weapons for your Palico, which helps them scale up with you as monsters get tougher, and honestly my Palico was absolutely invaluable, even in Multiplayer. I decided to give my Palico a paralysis weapon, which gave me so many openings to attack the monster with, even if it was uncommon, over the playthrough it saved me so many times, and helped me clutch victory. Unfortunately, the Palico isn’t all positives, as if you’re by yourself, you have to rely on the Palico to get you out of specific status ailments. Stun and sleep are the two big ones that you really need your Palico to get you out of. Stun and sleep leave you wide open to be killed, but you can ping your Palico to hit you out of these… unfortunately the Palico is not consistent with doing this. Sometimes they’ll be on top of it and hit you every single time, other times they’ll ignore your cry for help and watch as you die. Because of this, relying on your Palico for these situations is incredibly risky, and I personally ensured this never happened because I didn’t trust my luck. Otherwise, the Palico is incredibly useful, especially for a support role. I gave my Palico vigor wasp spray the entire playthrough alongside a status weapon, and they were an invaluable part of my team and strategy, so overall Palico was an awesome and welcome addition to the game, and my team.

Now that I’ve gone over most of the positives, let’s go into some of the negatives.

My largest negative with Monster hunter world is the single-player experience. Now don’t get me wrong here, you can absolutely play and enjoy this game by yourself, and I have tons of admiration and respect for those who can solo the hardest monsters in the game, but to me, this was the epitome of my bad experiences with this game. A lot of the mechanics and design of this game seemed very geared towards multiplayer in a lot of ways, one aspect of it to me that screams this more than any other is stun. Stun is an overly punishing mechanic that, when hit too many times in quick succession by a monster, you lose all control of your hunter as they stand there like a sitting duck to get killed. Now yes, your Palico can hit you out of it like I mentioned, but it’s inconsistent, and while you can run Stun Resist to completely remove the mechanic altogether, I found it incredibly unfair and not fun to deal with. The game tells you that you can get out of stun faster by wiggling the left stick, however this does not impact much as far as how long you’re in stun for. On top of this, monsters with no split aggro can kill you in a matter of seconds, all it takes is a few swipes, and you’re as good as gone. A game like this, positioning and finding openings is crucial for success, but in my experience a lot of this never mattered when I was by myself because the monster would always be on me and I couldn’t do much about it. Now you do have your Palico friend to split the aggro up for you a bit, but I found it to not be enough to feel comfortable or even confident to go in and fight the monster, most of the time I just ran away and hung around waiting for a move I felt I could punish before going in. This, on top of insane hitboxes, stun, and slow recoveries with items and get-ups, ruined any semblance of pacing during battles and often found myself running the clock out on these hunts. Just as well, I failed many quests where I was assured victory just so long as I had enough time to capture the monster because I played too safe since I deemed the risk too high. Again, this is just my personal experience, and I know a lot of people stand by this game as a single-player experience, but for me, I vastly prefer playing in Multiplayer. Single-Player was just incredibly frustrating and unfun and often soiled my enjoyment of the game in sessions where I had to play by myself. I will say, once I had a competent build with the quality of life skills I wanted, Single-Player was less arduous and annoying, but I still didn’t find it nearly as engaging or rewarding as sharing my victories with my friend, or with other randoms after defeating a powerful monster together.

The roll, or more specifically, the lack of i-frames on the roll. I come from a very Fromsoft background, so a lot of my experience with these kinds of games are the likes of Dark Souls. Bloodborne, and Sekiro. While those and Monster Hunter play very differently, they both share one thing in common, and that’s a roll. In Monster Hunter, the roll allows you to reposition and dodge attacks from the monster, however the amount of i-frames it has does not always allow this. Some attacks are so long or have such giant hitboxes, your roll simply cannot dodge it and you will get hit. Just like Stun Resist, you can use skills like Evade Window to increase the amount of i-frames the roll has, and jumping to increase how far it goes. With that said however, the base roll should be good enough to dodge most quick attacks, because if it did, it’d tremendously help with the pacing and flow of fights once again. Now there is a more committal roll option called a “dive” where you run away from the monster, run, then roll, and you will dive. The dive has plenty of i-frames to dodge pretty much any attack, and there’s specific attacks monsters use with the dive in mind I actually really like. Nergigante’s dive-bomb move being a good example of one of these moves. The issue with dive is it takes forever to recover from, and getting your hunter to dive is too finicky for me. If you have your weapon drawn, forget about diving, it will not happen, and I’ve suffered many deaths from not being able to sheathe fast enough to dive, which very much annoyed me. I understand both this and stun are things you can alleviate or outright remove with certain skills, however skills have their own issues.

Decorations being random drops is something I’ll never understand. I’ve recently learned from a good friend of mine, Lemonstrade whom I’ve been talking to about my experience with Monster Hunter World, that previous Monster Hunter games did not have random decorations, but were simply craftable from specific monster parts. Not only would this have helped make more monsters useful to hunt in my playthrough, because I had so many monster parts just collecting dust, but would also allow you to focus in on decorations you really needed. Decorations are what give you those skills I’ve been mentioning in this review a lot. In order to get these decorations, you get them as rewards from pretty much every activity in the game. The big issue is: what decorations you get are entirely random. This to me is flat-out padding and a really bad idea overall. If I was struggling with stun or my roll being a bit too hard to use effectively, I should in theory, be able to grind for the decorations to help with me, not random chance. So instead, I have to grind monsters for potentially hours, and maybe never get what I’m looking for, which will make these issues much more consistent and noticeable throughout my experience, and surprise, they were. It’s especially bad in endgame when you want to optimize builds, or go for a luxurious build that makes the game more forgiving to play, good luck getting the decorations you need in a reasonable amount of time, though you may get lucky. What’s worse is you don’t even need to fight especially hard monsters to get decent gems, you can fight a special event called Greatest Jagras that’s always available now to grind gems, so it’s not even a matter of skill, it’s a matter of time. Gem farming takes too long, less monsters become useful to get their materials for, makes certain issues way harder to solve, and overall doesn’t feel rewarding, it’s all luck. I was able to get all the gems I needed through dedicated work, but I’m hoping the upcoming Monster Hunter game: Wilds fixes this issue and reverts back to the old way Monster Hunter games did it, by allowing you to craft gems you want, not a slot machine.

Last complaint I really have with Monster Hunter World is how jank it felt to play at first. A lot of things in this game did not come very naturally for me, such as sheathing and unsheathing my weapon, which thankfully running auto-sheathes for you. A lot of the animations in Monster Hunter are long and very committal, so you can’t just mash attack and get away with it, or cancel out of it like roll, at least with LongSword this was the case. I often got too greedy and got hit a lot, which led to some frustration, but I began to understand Monster Hunter is a slower-paced game, so playing it slower helps, but that’s not the case with certain quests only giving you 30 minutes or so, which puts the pressure on. Odd hitboxes and strong attacks were the least of my issues when it came to traversing areas, specifically the Ancient forest. Visually, it gets across how nature-focused this game is, but on the other hand, what an absolutely terribly designed area overall, and a nightmare to traverse. This really shouldn’t have been the first area, since later areas don’t suffer this labyrinthian design like Ancient Forest does, but have their own fair share of issues. While the game is called “Monster Hunter” actually hunting The monsters felt like a chore a lot of the time. Having to find footprints and markings, collecting them, gaining research, and then the scout flies tell you where to go. Not only do the Scout Flies sometimes just don’t tell you the right way to go, but it feels very hand-holding at the same time, I’d much prefer finding the monsters on my own without all these extra steps. Of course, you obviously can ignore the Scout Flies and the track-hunting most of the time, but some missions require you do it, and it bogs the game down so much. Much later on, you’ll have to find tracks for some particularly special monsters by revisiting older regions, and only once you fulfill the research requirement can you locate them and fight them to progress the game. Once again this feels like padding, since no other Monster Hunter game does this, so it’s an odd choice World would decide to do it. Though I’ve been informed many times that World is an “outlier” when it comes to Monster Hunter, these criticisms will likely only apply to this entry. A lot of the actual controls for the game felt fine enough, but as I mentioned before, diving was sometimes inconsistent, odd hitboxes, bad roll, stun, the entirety of the Ancient Forest, sheathing, it all felt janky for a game made in 2018. Now I will concede a lot of this stuff I adapted to overtime and got used to it, but initially these things turned me off from the game, but I really wanted to get into this series, and my friend helped me a lot along the way, so I’m very thankful those first handful of hours were easier because of that. I wouldn’t say even World as accessible as it might be for the series, is still quite intimidating and very hard to get a grasp of, but once you do and it clicks, it becomes a very addicting and satisfying experience.

Sieges, more specifically Zorah Magdaros. Every mission involving this oversized lava cake I did not enjoy whatsoever. The scale is quite amazing, and can be quite exhilarating when you first begin one of these giant monster sieges, but you quickly realize just how shallow it is. You use some special weapons like the cannon and the ballista to deal damage, you wait around for an eternity, you get a cutscene, then you do it again until the quest ends. It’s not engaging, it’s mechanically shallow, and it’s unnecessary. I love the idea on paper, but the execution is just so bad, I couldn’t wait for them to be over with, and I never went back to grind these missions either because they were so dull to me. Zorah Magdaros has an excellent introduction at the start of the game and presents tons of interesting questions and ideas about where the plot might go, which unfortunately is rather… mediocre. Gameplay wise? It’s just disappointing.

Last, but certainly not least, The Handler. Now The Handler has a notorious reputation for being annoying and constantly getting into trouble, and yeah I see where people are coming from. To be completely blunt, I did not care about her in the slightest, nor any character in this game. They all feel so shallow with little character besides a few quirks that helps them at least not meld into the same NPC’s, but there’s not enough there for me. With the Handler, she’s certainly annoying, but I don’t hate her as much as others. My issue is, with a character so paramount to you as a hunter, she should have far more caution and experience in the field, but she comes across aloof, and a liability, which is irksome. The game literally gives my hunter the background of being an A-list hunter from the Old world, a seasoned veteran, but then my Handler acts like a complete new blood? That doesn’t add up to me. Missions where you have to follow her are even worse, because her corny dialogue doesn't help her case I’m afraid, on top of gameplay slowing to a crawl so I’ll care about what she’s saying, or her well-being when the character isn’t well-written enough for that to be a possibility. Honestly, most story sequences I did not care for, all I really wanted to do was hunt monsters and become stronger, which is both good and bad. Good because the gameplay is good enough for me to want to get back to it, bad because the story is so boring and inconsequential to me it’s getting in the way of what I truly enjoy. Add unskippable cutscenes and friends not being able to join each other until everyone has seen the cutscene within a mission, and you have the recipe for disaster and a lot of annoyance. I digress, the handler, let me reiterate, I do not hate as much as others, but she is the golden example of one of my big issues this game has, emphasizing boring characters and a boring story I do not care about, I just want to hunt monsters.

Since we’re nearing the end of this review, I’ll quickly go over the music. Monster Hunter World has a surprisingly good soundtrack with plenty of memorable tracks, though it also balances it out with just allowing the nature of the World to speak for itself without music. There wasn’t too many songs that caught my ear while playing, but generally most songs were pretty good! My favorites were: Pride of a Nameless Hunter, Nergigante Theme, and Bazelgeuse Theme.

Monster Hunter World was a monumental, refreshing yet equally frustrating experience that I already look back on quite fondly. As a Multiplayer game? It’s top-notch, and one I’d highly recommend if you can find people to play with, there is nothing quite like that rush of taking down a new monster, or mastering the patterns of older foes. Satisfying gameplay loop with even more satisfying progression, great combat with a bit of jank in level design, mechanics, and hitboxes, a lackluster story with even more lackluster characters, and quite a bit of padding that you’ll either tolerate or dislike. Incredibly immersive monster designs and behaviors, excellent interactions, fantastic environmental interactivity, slow-paced yet fast, methodical and savage in tandem, it’s truly remarkable. I have to say, I loved Monster Hunter World, and cannot wait to dive into other games in the series, like 4U, Rise, and Wilds in the near future! Thank you all for reading this review, this is by far my longest review, and I’m still not done talking about this game! The Iceborne review will be out sometime soon, but I hope this review can tide you all over until then. As I’ve mentioned in other reviews, I'm still going to wrap up FFIV soon, and start Va11-Halla very soon as well. I also just want to say thank you all for the exponential growth lately! You all only continue to inspire and drive me forward with writing these, so please look forward to more as I continue to put more and more into this. Truly, thank you all so much! I’ll see you all in the next review, until next time.

It isn't Rewind Time...?

Mega Man 2 felt a lot better to play than the original game, but it also came with its own set of glaring issues. The new stages look pretty (for NES standards) and the toned down difficulty compared to MM1 definitely helped my enjoyment too, as I no longer had to rely on the Legacy Collection's rewind feature as much to progress through the game at a normal pace. However this is still a Mega Man game at its core, which means you can't just have a good time like that.

In the case of Mega Man 2, my main complaints come from two stages, two bosses and the insane amount of flashing lights thrown into your face whenever you beat a boss. Heat Man's stage revolves around a gimmick forcing you to guess where an invisible block will pop up next, causing you to proceed with trial and error until you eventually manage to land on such a block, just to repeat it over and over. Not a problem with the rewind feature as you can just "know" where the next block will pop up, but this was NOT the case for the players in 1989. A pretty frustrating trial-and-error experience in theory, even if it didn't affect me badly because of my ability to rewind. Next stage complaint, Quick Man's stage has a cool concept with the level closing in on you over time, so you're supposed to rush through the level. While it does sound cool at first, Capcom's vision for this idea were insta-kill lasers, so now instead of shifting the focus on the speed of the level, it's now all about how precise you're about to control through these lasers (and the timing for some of these falls are really relentless).

Okay, so these two stages have some trial-and-error, but did you know there are also actual roadblocks in Mega Man 2 if you don't meet certain conditions? I'm talking about the Stage 4 boss of Wily's Castle and the final phase of Wily himself. The boss on Stage 4 is a glorified puzzle, you need to use the Crash Bombs at specific locations in order to take down multiple turrets in the boss room. The thing is, if your Crash meter isn't full enough, you won't be able to beat this fight - every other weapon gets deflected from the turrets and some are guarded by walls. As for Wily in his final phase, for some reason he's completely immune to all weapons except Bubble Man's bubbles. Same issue as with the Stage 4 boss, if your meter is empty you can't win the fight. I feel really bad for everyone who played this back then, got to the final boss and couldn't beat him because of this laughable restriction.

Nonetheless I did have a somewhat good time with Mega Man 2, as most levels are big improvements over the ones in MM1 in terms of gameplay and design, but the aforementioned issues make it hard for me to give this game a higher score. Atleast I have heard many good things about Mega Man 3, so I'm looking forward to playing that one in the upcoming days!

I can barely put into words the whiplash that I felt realizing that Potemkin's old VA uses the same filter as those "IF GREAT KING OF EVIL GANONDORF DID X" memes.

This is a pretty good entry level handheld RPG with some good systems design and enjoyable dungeons, clearly riffing on Zelda, but it's doing more than your typical RPG dungeons. The real flaw with the game is how bland the main cast are and how simple the story is, despite the games abundance of text to tell it. It can just get absurd how long some scenes are when what's actually communicated to the player could be boiled down in a fraction of the words used. Overall its a decent RPG, but kind of the epitome of a comfort food game that doesn't ask terribly much from the player nor challenge them in its mechanics or writing.

It's weird to consider that Hotline Miami might be one of THE most seminal games from the 2010s'. It helped inspire a swath of artists, from game developers to musicians, for the decade to follow.

Do you want to know why I said that it's only "one of" the most seminal games of the last decade? Because Dark Souls has three games in its main series, one game that came before it and a remake of that one game, and at least three games by the same developer that play just like it.

We are no longer in the era of sequels being a neat addition—cinematic universes, television, and live services are all more popular than they've ever been before. Whether or not you're ready to brace a media landscape where the idea of discussion being finite begins and ends with "but I can't wait for the sequel" is irrelevant; this is where we're at, and we're too far in to course correct now.

For the moxie of the developers to not want to squeeze their golden goose too hard, I admire their work. It's not just that they've made two all-time indie classics, the likes of which helped define the scene in the late 2000s'. It's that they made a really good game, let people talk about it until they inevitably moved on, and didn't try to keep its relevance on life support for ten years. Hotline Miami is relevant ten years later because the artists it helped inspire wound up creating games like it, with more to come in the future.

In terms of the game itself, it's about as fast, brutal, and fun as you've been told it is. Its commentary on violence in video games might not be the revelation it once was. But compared to a lot of the meta-commentary that was being made in games at the time, it's surprisingly subtle and doesn't overstep its boundaries. The soundtrack is, of course, magnificent, and I still listen to it daily. Hotline Miami is the kind of game that I stop, start, stop, and then eventually finish just that one more time. Part of what makes that meta-commentary hold up slightly more than it should is that Hotline Miami is a genuinely fun game to play and revisit. Hell yeah, I'll bruise some bad dudes with my free time! Why the hell not?

I've played around three versions of this game, and that's mostly to test the waters. For my money, the best port for this game is on the Nintendo Switch. But the Vita version gets very close! Hotline Miami on the Vita uses the back touchscreen in a way that makes me proud to say that I'm a Vita owner, if only because nothing else feels like it. But it's those joysticks, man. They're too small, and their deadzones are pretty tiny, and my god, you feel it while playing Hotline Miami. It's a little better than the second game on the Vita, though. Good lord, hand me a Switch, and I'll blaze through the first few levels of that game, but I can barely dodge roll to save my life on the Vita port.

Anyway, five stars, and I regret nothing.

A story of love and revenge told through ellipsis. A tale of violence reduced to its visceral fundamentals. Abstracted until the literal no longer matters and the work can indulge in the essential symbols and aesthetics.

In my opinion, it outdoes other games released at the time that tried to be self-critical of the mechanics being designed for violence and the implications of such. That because of Hotline Miami’s emphasis less on the shaming of the player, and more on the ways we distance ourselves from our actions in virtual spaces with context and the particular abstraction inherent to the videogame look.

Pushing us out of the comfort that virtuality gives us by constantly involving us, asking us question and calling attention to what we exert. Every time we kill dozens of enemies, having the need to contemplate the destructed bodies of every one of them on our way back to the place that we started in.

Video-game avatars as masks (like those Jacket wears before committing atrocities). Figures we control that serve to express ourselves in a space. Even when the only way that we can see of achieving that expression in the digital being through violent acts. All a performativity that the creators allow themselves to break down. Pointing at its farce and putting it apart so they can directly involve us in a conversation about what makes us wish for enacting these stories.

We might want to moralize our habits of playing through intellectualizing. The actions as means for encountering meaning of any kind, especially if it is irony. That it is okay that I exert violence in a virtual space because the game is making a critique of violence (the military FPS being the quintessential example of this falsity).

However, any of that would be nothing more than dishonest. We are not given a reason by the game of what we did. Nothing that rationalizes our journey, because we were not looking for anything in the first place. We just wanted to indulge ourselves. It is as intellectually unrewarding as that.

In so, the game not only explores exerted virtual violence and our relation to it as perpetuators, but also the futility of our agency in any form of system. We are taking from place to place by the designers to execute a very strict set of actions without possibility for more. We might like to indulge in the power fantasy, but in the end, we are being used by the game. We don’t have a choice over where we will go because it is all designed a priori. Anything we do having been not only considered but also planned. And any illusion of choice is all within the restrictions that the game puts us in. So we can do what they want us to do.

An anxiety that gains a political dimension with how it parallels how Jacket and Biker are used by a group with its own agenda, as if they were nothing more than tools. An agenda that they are not told about. Just doing it because it is what they have been ordered to. If anything, this game shows an understanding of its particular source (Drive, which itself was inspired by Le Samourai) that goes beyond the mere appropriation. That these symbols all served for stories about lonely men defined purely by their labor that are finally confronted with the consequences of their involvement, being left with nothing in the end. Although to this, Hotline Miami adds a viscerality in the trauma of normalizing violence that fits with its conceptual interests.

The only real shame is how this effect is kind of undermined by how there is, in the end, a rational explanation that gives meaning to all of us actions. A revelation that enhances the political side of the story in its usage of cold war confrontations and PTSD. However, in the process also takes away from the abstraction that is part of why this works so well on an aesthetic level. And so it kind of falls in what it tries to critique by giving us the comfort of the reason to justify what we did. Still, the experience of playing the game and getting these conflicted emotions by the situation that we are put in is something that cannot be taken away even by the worst twist (it does make it easier to forgive that when it's a secret ending that you need to find collectibles for, rather than being what you get when you only complete the story). More so with design this polish and an understanding of video-game language this intense.

I am very much sorry for bringing my big pretensiousness to video games too. It's what being bored and not being able to sleep does lmao.

Hi-Fi Rush is just a blast from start to finish. The characters are fun and interesting, the writing is great with fantastic comedic timing in the dialogue and physical humor, the combat is really fun and the music is good too.

The only reason it's not getting 5 stars is because
1) I found that the music was a little too similar from one level to another. While I enjoyed all of the music, I think the very fact that it's a rhythm game kind of locked them in to featuring heavy beat, high energy music, and I did get a little tired of hearing the same stuff over and over.
2) As I got better at the timing I, of course, felt more satisfied with my performance, but also started to get a little bored of the combat. At the start combat was challenging because I was learning how to make sure that my rhythm was on beat and it took time to learn how many beats different attacks take to execute, but by the end of the game I was able to intuitively dodge or counter incoming attacks without much thought. This is a very cool and incredibly apparent indication that I was learning and improving and that the game mechanics are solid, but unfortunately it translated to slightly monotonous battles near the end.

I absolutely loved my experience with Hi-Fi Rush even with the two complaints above. There were some truly epic moments!

Ah. That’s more like it.

As the one person I know who likes Donkey Kong Country, Drill Dozer, and that one burrowing escape sequence from Ori and the Will of the Wisps, I knew Pepper Grinder was going to be right up my alley. What impressed me though, was just how precisely the game melded its influences into something that felt simultaneously fresh yet familiar. The level design is classic obstacle escalation (introduce a concept, scale it up, throw in a twist, and then run the player through a final exam into their victory lap) with DKC inspired secrets with skull coin collectibles for unlocking secret levels. Many of the usual formula beats are present as well to force execution tests, from the usual moving parts in the forms of cannons, rope swings, and grappling points, to constantly present sources of danger like the freezing ocean or the temporary dirt patches created from cooling lava. What sets Pepper Grinder apart however, is that the terrain itself is the main obstacle. It feels like such a natural pairing to seamlessly mesh environmental navigation with the course’s very foundation, and the best moments of the game lean into funneling the player through various layers of shifting and isolated terrain while tearing through all that may stand in their way.

That said, I think to really understand the nuances of Pepper Grinder, one has to readily commit to its time attack mode. I could have been sold on the game-feel alone as an amalgam of Donkey Kong Country’s momentum physics and Drill Dozer’s force feedback, but playing under circumstances that force you to squeeze every possible second out of the timer gives the player a better appreciation of its movement mechanics. Pepper is not very fast on foot, nor can she naturally jump very far. Therefore, you’d think that most speed comes from tunneling through terrain, but it’s not quite that either. Rather, the player has to maintain momentum through the interplay of drilling and jumping by exiting terrain via the drill run (boosting right as you’re about to leave a patch of dirt), which commits the player to the projected arc leaving the terrain but with the reward of significantly more speed. The result is some of the weightiest and most satisfying movement I have ever experienced in any platformer. I was constantly figuring out new ways to save seconds by timing by boosts both within terrain and right before exiting terrain (since you can’t just spam boost and using it too early can lock you out from getting the necessary boost jump out of terrain), skipping certain obstacles entirely with well-placed drill runs, and figuring out how to manage my health to bypass unfavorable cycles and damage boost past mines and thorns. Some of those gold time attack medals were tight ordeals, but I absolutely savored every moment of the grind.

Bosses as a whole are a significant improvement from the usual quality of those in Donkey Kong Country. You’re not safe just waiting above ground, and burrowing to dodge attacks forces you to at least dash-dance underground since drilling means you can’t stay in one place. As a result, the player is constantly on the move, and you’re incentivized to do so anyways given that most of the bosses require multiple hits to defeat and aren’t the usual “invincible until they’re done attacking” crop from DKC. The biggest complaint I can levy here is that boss hit/hurtboxes can feel imprecise; I’ve heard that many players have had difficulty figuring out how to correctly drill into the beetle boss’s underbelly, and while I had no issues there, I did die a few times from the skeleton king’s heel hitbox where there was no visible attack in its vicinity. Still, I much prefer these boss fights over many of its peers, and figuring out when and how to best aim drill runs from the ground to speedrun bosses was just as much of a pleasure as speedrunning the courses themselves.

There are a few questionable design choices that could be touched upon here. Firstly, there’s a shop system present where you can purchase optional stickers from a gacha machine as well as temporary health boosts. The former is mostly forgivable given that they don’t impact the gameplay otherwise and can be cleared in about three minutes of purchasing and opening capsules. That said, I feel as if the latter could be removed entirely given that I never felt pressured to purchase insurance for courses and bosses, especially because I was often taking hits anyways to skip past obstacles and because you’re not going to regain the extra health capacity in-level once it’s gone. Secondly, bosses in time-attack mode force you to watch their opening unskippable cutscenes before getting to the action, and this gets extremely irritating when you’re constantly restarting fights to get better times. Finally, Pepper Grinder has a few gimmick areas in the forms of a couple of robot platforming segments, two snowmobile sections where you just hold forward on the control stick, and a couple of run-and-gun levels with little drilling involved. I can look past most of these given that they don’t take up much time and that I enjoyed all the minecart levels from DKC as is, though I do wish that they spaced the gimmicks apart a bit more given that levels 4-3 and 4-4 both have significant run and gun segments sending each course off.

If I did have any lasting complaints, it would be that I just want more of this game. Most players will finish adventure mode in under four hours. That said, even despite a lack of polish here and there, I absolutely adore Pepper Grinder. At this time of writing, I’ve 100%ed the game and even gone back to a few time trials after snagging all the gold medals just to further polish my records. It’s often difficult for me to pin down what makes a game feel good to play, but in this case, I just know. Pepper Grinder feels like an adrenaline rush made just for me, and though its execution barriers and short length will likely make this a tough sell for many, it is undoubtably some of the most fun I have had with a game this year. If you’re curious or enjoy anything that I’ve discussed in this write-up, please give the demo a shot. They don’t make 2D platformers like this anymore, and Pepper Grinder’s existence leaves me wondering why when they absolutely killed it on their first try.

How I learned to stop worrying and love Pizza Tower.

Seriously though, despite being a bit disappointed in my first playthrough, I kept coming back to it eventually in some way. The Noise update gave me another reason to do a full playthrough since he is a pretty different character, and I think that was enough to convince me that this game is actually pretty great. As much as I want to hate it due to its Ohio rizz band kid zoomer fanbase, I really can't. It really is an exceptional game. There's a lot of charm and genuine soul put into this that's very rare these days. I even went for a few P ranks and was surprised by how addicting it was. Definitely don't have the patience to P rank the whole game, but I finally get what people love about this game.

It's still not as good as Wario Land 4 though.